Run 0086802a
The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action.
Original request
[direct-dispatch:bypass-orchestrator-block:exp#192] Operator-issued dispatch after fixing pod_spec. Original orchestrator refused because prior auto-recovery overwrote plan_md with a blocker report.
Failure or crash reason
isSuccessTerminal is not defined
Previous run transcript
- 2026-05-14T08:52:34.082Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T08:53:05.785Z deploy_pod_started: pc79b5566vhrz6 - 2026-05-14T08:53:05.809Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T08:54:04.399Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T08:54:04.413Z runpod_retry: isSuccessTerminal is not defined - 2026-05-14T08:55:04.342Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T08:55:04.352Z runpod_retry: isSuccessTerminal is not defined - 2026-05-14T08:56:04.297Z runpod_status: RUNNING
Resume history
This run resumes 37df0ad6.
Plan
Goal
Diagnose why direct-dispatch r5 for experiment #192 failed in the same fleet-wide pattern as r4, and produce a blocker that prevents further compute burn until the underlying RunPod-side or account-level event is identified by the human owner.
Hypothesis
Pods are being terminated by an out-of-band actor (RunPod-side reclaim, billing/auth event affecting the API key, or manual sweep) within ~60–90 seconds of reporting `RUNNING`, across multiple experiments and across **both** team and personal accounts. The r5 attempt for #192 is one of at least four simultaneously affected dispatches in the 10:53–10:55 UTC window.
Prediction
If I re-dispatch the same A100 r5 spec right now, the new pod will: 1. Report `RUNNING` within ~40s of dispatch, 2. Disappear from whichever account it was billed to within ~60s after that, 3. Trigger an r6 auto-recovery with an identical "Pod … not found in account=…" failure reason, 4. Burn another ~$1.50–3 of A100 time for ~90s of effectively-no-work compute. There is no per-experiment code change that would prevent this. The r4 plan_json correctly noted the EPS script fix (`22739aab`) and bootstrap hardening (`pod-bootstrap.ts:230-264`) were already in place; r5 confirms those did not cause and cannot fix the failure.
Kill Criterion
This recovery run is itself the kill criterion: I am stopping with a blocker rather than emitting a runpod-spec. The criterion that would *unblock* re-dispatch is one of: - The owner identifies a specific RunPod-side cause (billing cap, API key rotation, manual sweep, regional capacity reclaim) and confirms it has cleared, OR - The owner observes ≥1 unrelated control dispatch (e.g. exp #363, #366, #333 r6) running successfully past the ~2-minute mark in the same window.
Experimental Setup
No new compute. Evidence-collection only, captured here: **r4 wave (10:39–10:45 UTC, team account):** 4 sibling A100 dispatches; 3 vanished from `account=team` within ~3 minutes (per prior plan_json analysis on this experiment). **r5 wave (10:53–10:55 UTC, both accounts):** at least four experiments lost pods simultaneously: | run | exp | pod | account | RUNNING at | lost at | gap | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | `3d8f3042…` (this) | #192 | `v0c7bx292xqvg4` | team | 10:53:54 | 10:54:55 | ~61s | | `6e8a0593…` | #363 | `m1ayhl6nsbxw04` | team | 10:53:54 | 10:54:54 | ~60s | | `9e039246…` | #366 | `lqpfpmbytlgded` | team | 10:44:53 | 10:54:54 | (long-running, killed in same window) | | `32e93989…` | #333 | `j0xvy1q82ryo8m`, `cv13x9s487tvwn` | **personal** | 10:53:55 | 10:54:54 | ~60s | The exp #333 row is decisive: that recovery had **deliberately switched from team to personal** because r1–r4 had already failed on team, and personal **also** lost both of its pods in the same ~60s window. This rules out the team-only hypothesis from the r4 diagnosis.
Compute and Hardware
**No compute dispatched.** The Approval Checklist below explicitly does not approve a runpod-spec. If re-approved later, the canonical shape from the existing experiment record (1× A100 80GB SXM, single pod, ~3h estimated, ~$4.50 at the $1.49/GPU-hr SXM rate plus negligible storage) remains valid — no plan edit is required, only resolution of the account-level event.
Artifacts
This blocker plan is the only artifact. No models, datasets, evals, or figures will be produced by this run.
Verification
The owner can verify the diagnosis without my access by: 1. Opening the RunPod console for **both** the team and personal accounts and inspecting the audit/event log for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC. Look for `podTerminate`, billing alerts, API-key revocations, or capacity-reclaim notices. 2. Cross-referencing the four pod IDs above (`v0c7bx292xqvg4`, `m1ayhl6nsbxw04`, `lqpfpmbytlgded`, `j0xvy1q82ryo8m`, `cv13x9s487tvwn`) — if a single RunPod-side action terminated them, the audit log will likely group them. 3. Checking whether the same window shows successful (non-reaped) dispatches from other Sagan experiments; e.g. exp #365 pod `j18eiux6ccekyj` was reported as `status=running` in the r4 diagnosis — if it is now also gone, the event is platform-wide rather than account-wide.
Risks and Red Team
- **Risk of unnecessary blocker.** If the platform event has already cleared, I am wasting time by not re-dispatching. *Mitigation:* this run does not edit the plan_md or pod_spec on `experiments.b50b82c2…`, so re-approval is one click for the owner once they confirm the account is healthy. - **Risk of misdiagnosis.** I have not directly queried the RunPod API for these pods' termination reasons (no MCP tool calls to RunPod in this thread, and the prior plan_json correctly noted that out-of-band action is the most likely explanation). *Mitigation:* the cross-account, multi-experiment, sub-90-second pattern is too tight to be explained by anything in our codepath; the wrapper's `sleep infinity` (`pod-bootstrap.ts:230-264`) makes a script-side exit impossible to manifest as "not found in account". - **Risk of compounding loss.** If I had re-dispatched, the next failure would have produced an r6 recovery that would itself recurse — the four parallel recovery runs already running at 10:57 UTC show the loop is in flight; emitting another spec accelerates it. **Critique loop notes.** This is a recovery-context blocker, not a fresh adversarial plan, so the bounded 3-loop paired-critic workflow is not applicable. The prior plan_json (r4 analysis) already passed adversarial review and explicitly recommended not re-dispatching; r5's failure is the strongest possible confirmation of that recommendation. No critique loops run; no Codex fallback; no folded follow-ups.
Likely Clean Result
No clean result will be produced by this run. When the underlying event is resolved and the experiment eventually completes, the clean result for #192 (a separate future write-up) will answer "Can capability be taught through another persona?" using the persona-spread pipeline at branch `exp-192-persona-spread@22739aab`. That is unchanged by this recovery.
Approval Checklist
- [x] **Goal** — diagnose r5 failure, produce blocker, do not dispatch. Matches recovery prompt's "stop with a concise blocker" branch. - [x] **Hypothesis** — cross-account out-of-band pod termination, not script bug. - [x] **Prediction** — re-dispatch would fail the same way within ~90s. - [x] **Kill criterion** — blocker; unblocking requires owner-side RunPod console inspection. - [x] **Compute/hardware/USD** — **no compute approved**; no USD spend by this run. - [x] **Artifacts** — this plan only. - [x] **Verification** — RunPod console audit logs (team + personal) for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC. - [x] **Risks** — covered above; cross-account evidence rules out the team-only hypothesis from r4. - [x] **Likely clean-result shape** — unchanged from prior approved plan; not produced by this run. - [x] **Runpod-spec matches plan** — **no runpod-spec emitted, by design.** Per the system prompt: "If the experiment truly should not launch compute, do not use kind=experiment; write a blocker…". The original kind=experiment dispatch is preserved by simply not emitting a fenced `runpod-spec` block, which the runner treats as a blocker. --- **Exact next manual action (owner):** 1. Open the RunPod console for the **team** account → Events/Audit log for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC. Look for grouped `podTerminate` events covering `v0c7bx292xqvg4`, `m1ayhl6nsbxw04`, `lqpfpmbytlgded`. 2. Open the RunPod console for the **personal** account → same window. Look for the termination of `j0xvy1q82ryo8m` and `cv13x9s487tvwn`. If both accounts show the same termination cause, the issue is RunPod-side (open a support ticket with these five pod IDs). If they show different causes, treat the team and personal events separately. 3. Check billing/usage caps on both accounts for the day — a hard cap hit at the team level could explain the team failures, but **does not** explain the personal-account failure unless that account is also near a cap. 4. Once the cause is identified and confirmed cleared, re-approve `experiments.b50b82c2-eefe-4d8a-924f-9ac776084b97` as-is. No plan_md, pod_spec, or branch change is needed. [TEXTBOX:runpod-team-audit-summary] [TEXTBOX:runpod-personal-audit-summary] [TEXTBOX:owner-decision-redispatch-or-hold]
The evidence makes the blocker even more clear. The r5 wave at 10:53–10:55 UTC lost pods across multiple experiments simultaneously, and exp #333's r5 attempt on account=personal (the fallback after team failures) also lost its pods. This is no longer a team-account-specific event — both team and personal accounts are affected within the same window.
Goal
Diagnose why direct-dispatch r5 for experiment #192 failed in the same fleet-wide pattern as r4, and produce a blocker that prevents further compute burn until the underlying RunPod-side or account-level event is identified by the human owner.
Hypothesis
Pods are being terminated by an out-of-band actor (RunPod-side reclaim, billing/auth event affecting the API key, or manual sweep) within ~60–90 seconds of reporting RUNNING, across multiple experiments and across both team and personal accounts. The r5 attempt for #192 is one of at least four simultaneously affected dispatches in the 10:53–10:55 UTC window.
Prediction
If I re-dispatch the same A100 r5 spec right now, the new pod will:
- Report
RUNNINGwithin ~40s of dispatch, - Disappear from whichever account it was billed to within ~60s after that,
- Trigger an r6 auto-recovery with an identical "Pod … not found in account=…" failure reason,
- Burn another ~$1.50–3 of A100 time for ~90s of effectively-no-work compute.
There is no per-experiment code change that would prevent this. The r4 plan_json correctly noted the EPS script fix (22739aab) and bootstrap hardening (pod-bootstrap.ts:230-264) were already in place; r5 confirms those did not cause and cannot fix the failure.
Kill Criterion
This recovery run is itself the kill criterion: I am stopping with a blocker rather than emitting a runpod-spec. The criterion that would unblock re-dispatch is one of:
- The owner identifies a specific RunPod-side cause (billing cap, API key rotation, manual sweep, regional capacity reclaim) and confirms it has cleared, OR
- The owner observes ≥1 unrelated control dispatch (e.g. exp #363, #366, #333 r6) running successfully past the ~2-minute mark in the same window.
Experimental Setup
No new compute. Evidence-collection only, captured here:
r4 wave (10:39–10:45 UTC, team account): 4 sibling A100 dispatches; 3 vanished from account=team within ~3 minutes (per prior plan_json analysis on this experiment).
r5 wave (10:53–10:55 UTC, both accounts): at least four experiments lost pods simultaneously:
| run | exp | pod | account | RUNNING at | lost at | gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3d8f3042… (this) | #192 | v0c7bx292xqvg4 | team | 10:53:54 | 10:54:55 | ~61s |
6e8a0593… | #363 | m1ayhl6nsbxw04 | team | 10:53:54 | 10:54:54 | ~60s |
9e039246… | #366 | lqpfpmbytlgded | team | 10:44:53 | 10:54:54 | (long-running, killed in same window) |
32e93989… | #333 | j0xvy1q82ryo8m, cv13x9s487tvwn | personal | 10:53:55 | 10:54:54 | ~60s |
The exp #333 row is decisive: that recovery had deliberately switched from team to personal because r1–r4 had already failed on team, and personal also lost both of its pods in the same ~60s window. This rules out the team-only hypothesis from the r4 diagnosis.
Compute and Hardware
No compute dispatched. The Approval Checklist below explicitly does not approve a runpod-spec. If re-approved later, the canonical shape from the existing experiment record (1× A100 80GB SXM, single pod, ~3h estimated, ~$4.50 at the $1.49/GPU-hr SXM rate plus negligible storage) remains valid — no plan edit is required, only resolution of the account-level event.
Artifacts
This blocker plan is the only artifact. No models, datasets, evals, or figures will be produced by this run.
Verification
The owner can verify the diagnosis without my access by:
- Opening the RunPod console for both the team and personal accounts and inspecting the audit/event log for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC. Look for
podTerminate, billing alerts, API-key revocations, or capacity-reclaim notices. - Cross-referencing the four pod IDs above (
v0c7bx292xqvg4,m1ayhl6nsbxw04,lqpfpmbytlgded,j0xvy1q82ryo8m,cv13x9s487tvwn) — if a single RunPod-side action terminated them, the audit log will likely group them. - Checking whether the same window shows successful (non-reaped) dispatches from other Sagan experiments; e.g. exp #365 pod
j18eiux6ccekyjwas reported asstatus=runningin the r4 diagnosis — if it is now also gone, the event is platform-wide rather than account-wide.
Risks and Red Team
- Risk of unnecessary blocker. If the platform event has already cleared, I am wasting time by not re-dispatching. Mitigation: this run does not edit the plan_md or pod_spec on
experiments.b50b82c2…, so re-approval is one click for the owner once they confirm the account is healthy. - Risk of misdiagnosis. I have not directly queried the RunPod API for these pods' termination reasons (no MCP tool calls to RunPod in this thread, and the prior plan_json correctly noted that out-of-band action is the most likely explanation). Mitigation: the cross-account, multi-experiment, sub-90-second pattern is too tight to be explained by anything in our codepath; the wrapper's
sleep infinity(pod-bootstrap.ts:230-264) makes a script-side exit impossible to manifest as "not found in account". - Risk of compounding loss. If I had re-dispatched, the next failure would have produced an r6 recovery that would itself recurse — the four parallel recovery runs already running at 10:57 UTC show the loop is in flight; emitting another spec accelerates it.
Critique loop notes. This is a recovery-context blocker, not a fresh adversarial plan, so the bounded 3-loop paired-critic workflow is not applicable. The prior plan_json (r4 analysis) already passed adversarial review and explicitly recommended not re-dispatching; r5's failure is the strongest possible confirmation of that recommendation. No critique loops run; no Codex fallback; no folded follow-ups.
Likely Clean Result
No clean result will be produced by this run. When the underlying event is resolved and the experiment eventually completes, the clean result for #192 (a separate future write-up) will answer "Can capability be taught through another persona?" using the persona-spread pipeline at branch exp-192-persona-spread@22739aab. That is unchanged by this recovery.
Approval Checklist
- Goal — diagnose r5 failure, produce blocker, do not dispatch. Matches recovery prompt's "stop with a concise blocker" branch.
- Hypothesis — cross-account out-of-band pod termination, not script bug.
- Prediction — re-dispatch would fail the same way within ~90s.
- Kill criterion — blocker; unblocking requires owner-side RunPod console inspection.
- Compute/hardware/USD — no compute approved; no USD spend by this run.
- Artifacts — this plan only.
- Verification — RunPod console audit logs (team + personal) for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC.
- Risks — covered above; cross-account evidence rules out the team-only hypothesis from r4.
- Likely clean-result shape — unchanged from prior approved plan; not produced by this run.
- Runpod-spec matches plan — no runpod-spec emitted, by design. Per the system prompt: "If the experiment truly should not launch compute, do not use kind=experiment; write a blocker…". The original kind=experiment dispatch is preserved by simply not emitting a fenced
runpod-specblock, which the runner treats as a blocker.
Exact next manual action (owner):
- Open the RunPod console for the team account → Events/Audit log for 2026-05-14 10:53–10:55 UTC. Look for grouped
podTerminateevents coveringv0c7bx292xqvg4,m1ayhl6nsbxw04,lqpfpmbytlgded. - Open the RunPod console for the personal account → same window. Look for the termination of
j0xvy1q82ryo8mandcv13x9s487tvwn. If both accounts show the same termination cause, the issue is RunPod-side (open a support ticket with these five pod IDs). If they show different causes, treat the team and personal events separately. - Check billing/usage caps on both accounts for the day — a hard cap hit at the team level could explain the team failures, but does not explain the personal-account failure unless that account is also near a cap.
- Once the cause is identified and confirmed cleared, re-approve
experiments.b50b82c2-eefe-4d8a-924f-9ac776084b97as-is. No plan_md, pod_spec, or branch change is needed.
[TEXTBOX:runpod-team-audit-summary]
[TEXTBOX:runpod-personal-audit-summary]
[TEXTBOX:owner-decision-redispatch-or-hold]
Events
kind=experiment
I'll diagnose this auto-recovery. The transcript shows the pod was dispatched and is RUNNING, but the watcher throws `isSuccessTerminal is not defined` — that's a JavaScript ReferenceError in the runner code, not an experiment-script failure. Let me locate it.
tool=Grep
Grep
services/runner/src/watcher.ts:145: if (isSuccessTerminal(row.metadata)) {
services/runner/src/watcher.ts:299:function isSuccessTerminal(metadata: unknown): boolean {tool=Read
Read
120 status,
121 sshHost: pod.sshHost,
122 sshPort: pod.sshPort,
123 costPerHr: pod.costPerHr,
124 adjustedCostPerHr: pod.adjustedCostPerHr,
125 uptimeSeconds: pod.uptimeSeconds,
126 });
127 if (status === 'running') {
128 await markAgentRunRunning(row.agentRunId);
129 }
130 }
131
132 if (row.experimentId && status === 'running') {
133 await setExperimentWorkflowStatus(row.experimentId, 'running', 'RunPod pod is running.');
134 }
135 await notifyPipelineChanged(row.agentRunId ?? row.experimentId ?? row.runpodPodId);
136
137 // Post-refresh: the pod is still alive on RunPod, but its bootstrap may have
138 // POSTed a terminal "experiment completed" signal to /api/runpods/progress.
139 // The progress route stores that in pod_lifecycle.metadata.saganProgress
140 // without ever transitioning the experiment — RunPod will happily restart
141 // the container's entrypoint after each exit because desiredStatus=RUNNING,
142 // so without this finalizer a successfully-completing experiment loops
143 // forever (#192-class bug). When we see the success marker, stop the pod
144 // and check whether all siblings are done.
145 if (isSuccessTerminal(row.metadata)) {
146 await finalizePodTerminalSuccess(row).catch((err) =>
147 log.error('finalizePodTerminalSuccess failed', {
148 podId: row.runpodPodId,
149 err: String(err),
150 }),
151 );
152 }
153 }
154
155 async function updatePodFromInfo(row: PodLifecycleRow, pod: PodInfo, status: string) {
156 const now = new Date();
157 await db()
158 .update(schema.podLifecycle)
159 .set({
160 name: pod.name || row.name,
161 gpuTypeId: pod.gpuTypeId ?? row.gpuTypeId,
162 gpuCount: pod.gpuCount ?? row.gpuCount,
163 costPerHr: pod.costPerHr ?? row.costPerHr,
164 adjustedCostPerHr: pod.adjustedCostPerHr ?? row.adjustedCostPerHr,
165 uptimeSeconds: pod.uptimeSeconds ?? row.uptimeSeconds,
166 lastStartedAt: parseRunpodDate(pod.lastStartedAt) ?? row.lastStartedAt,
167 status,
168 desiredStatus: pod.desiredStatus,
169 sshHost: pod.sshHost,
170 sshPort: pod.sshPort,
171 lastCheckedAt: now,
172 lastHeartbeatAt: status === 'running' ? now : row.lastHeartbeatAt,
173 stoppedAt: status === 'stopped' ? now : row.stoppedAt,
174 terminatedAt: status === 'terminated' ? now : row.terminatedAt,
175 lastError: null,
176 updatedAt: now,
177 })
178 .where(eq(schema.podLifecycle.id, row.id));
179 }
180
181 function parseRunpodDate(value: string | null): Date | undefined {
182 if (!value) return undefined;
183 const date = new Date(value);
184 return Number.isNaN(date.getTime()) ? undefined : date;
185 }
186
187 async function handlePodRefreshError(row: PodLifecycleRow, message: string) {
188 const retryCount = row.retryCount + 1;
189 const blocked = retryCount >= row.maxRetries;
190 await db()
191 .update(schema.podLifecycle)
192 .set({
193 status: blocked ? 'blocked' : 'retrying',
194 retryCount,
195 blockedReason: blocked ? message.slice(0, 4000) : row.blockedReason,
196 lastError: message.slice(0, 4000),
197 lastCheckedAt: new Date(),
198 updatedAt: new Date(),
199 })
200 .where(eq(schema.podLifecycle.id, row.id));
201
202 let recovered = false;
203 if (blocked && row.agentRunId) {
204 recovered = await queueAutomaticRecoveryRun(row.agentRunId, message).catch((err) => {
205 log.warn('failed to queue RunPod recovery run', { runId: row.agentRunId, err: String(err) });
206 return false;
207 });
208 }
209
210 if (row.agentRunId) {
211 await emitEvent(row.agentRunId, blocked ? 'runpod_blocked' : 'runpod_retry', message.slice(0, 1000), {
212 podId: row.runpodPodId,
213 retryCount,
214 maxRetries: row.maxRetries,
215 });
216 if (blocked && !recovered) {
217 …The function IS defined at line 299, called at line 145. The runtime says it's not defined — meaning the running runner has a stale build. Let me check.
tool=Bash
Bash
---
tool=Bash
Bash
(Bash completed with no output)
tool=Bash
Bash
{
"name": "@sagan/runner",
"version": "0.0.0",
"private": true,
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"dev": "tsx watch src/index.ts",
"start": "tsx src/index.ts",
"smoke": "tsx scripts/smoke.ts",
"smoke-apply": "tsx scripts/smoke-apply.ts",
"apply-narrative-edit": "tsx scripts/apply-narrative-edit.ts",
"import-github-project": "tsx scripts/import-github-project.ts",
"runpod": "tsx scripts/runpod-cli.ts",
"pod-tool": "tsx scripts/pod-tool.ts",
"snapshot-mentor": "tsx scripts/snapshot-mentor.ts",
"typecheck": "tsc --noEmit"
},
"dependencies": {
"@anthropic-ai/sdk": "^0.81.0",
"@sagan/agent-protocol": "workspace:*",
"@sagan/api": "workspace:*",
"@sagan/db": "workspace:*",
"dotenv": "^16.4.7",
"drizzle-orm": "^0.36.4",
"fast-xml-parser": "^4.5.1",
"node-cron": "^3.0.3",
"postgres": "^3.4.5",
"zod": "^4.1.0"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@types/node": "^22.10.2",
"@types/node-cron": "^3.0.11",
"tsx": "^4.19.2",
"typescript": "^5.7.2"
}
}Runner uses `tsx` directly — so the live process runs the source on disk. The error means the systemd service hasn't been restarted since `isSuccessTerminal` was added. Let me check.
tool=Bash
Bash
2026-05-14 08:33:28.200121495 +0000 services/runner/src/watcher.ts
---
● sagan-runner.service - Sagan runner (headless Claude Code)
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/sagan-runner.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Thu 2026-05-14 08:32:01 UTC; 24min ago
Main PID: 3945698 (node)
Tasks: 257 (limit: 154557)
Memory: 1.7G (max: 50.0G available: 48.2G)
CPU: 3min 14.868s
CGroup: /system.slice/sagan-runner.service
├─3945698 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/bin/pnpm start
├─3945764 sh -c "tsx src/index.ts"
├─3945765 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/node_modules/.bin/tsx src/index.ts
├─3945777 /usr/bin/node --require /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/node_modules/tsx/dist/preflight.cjs --import file:///home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/node_modules/tsx/dist/loader.mjs src/index.ts
├─3945791 /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/node_modules/tsx/node_modules/@esbuild/linux-x64/bin/esbuild --service=0.27.7 --ping
├─3950243 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/node_modules/mcp-ssh-manager/src/index.js
├─3950384 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/node_modules/mcp-ssh-manager/src/index.js
├─3980648 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/node_modules/mcp-ssh-manager/src/index.js
├─3984911 /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/bin/claude --print --input-format stream-json --output-format stream-json --verbose --dangerously-skip-permissions
├─3984942 node /usr/bin/mcp-todoist
├─3985106 node /usr/bin/google-workspace-mcp start
├─3985237 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/node_modules/mcp-ssh-manager/src/index.jsRoot cause found: the runner started at **08:32:01 UTC**, then `watcher.ts` was modified at **08:33:28 UTC** to add `isSuccessTerminal`. The live process loaded the pre-fix version and is now hitting `ReferenceError` on every watch tick. The pod itself is actually RUNNING fine — the watcher just can't process its status. Let me check the pod state and active runs before recommending a restart.
tool=Bash
Bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Safe wrapper around `sudo systemctl restart sagan-runner`.
#
# Skips the restart entirely when nothing under services/runner/** has changed
# since the last runner restart, and refuses the restart when agent runs are
# active so we don't SIGTERM Claude subprocesses mid-flight.
#
# Use this — not raw `systemctl restart sagan-runner` — from agents, hooks,
# and deploy scripts. CLAUDE.md documents the contract.
#
# Flags:
# --force bypass the active-run check (still records the new SHA)
# --dry-run print what would happen without restarting
set -euo pipefail
REPO_ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/.." && pwd)"
SHA_FILE="${SAGAN_RUNNER_SHA_FILE:-$HOME/.sagan-runner-sha}"
RUNNER_PATH="services/runner"
FORCE=0
DRY_RUN=0
for arg in "$@"; do
case "$arg" in
--force) FORCE=1 ;;
--dry-run) DRY_RUN=1 ;;
*) echo "unknown flag: $arg" >&2; exit 2 ;;
esac
done
cd "$REPO_ROOT"
current_sha="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
recorded_sha=""
if [[ -f "$SHA_FILE" ]]; then
recorded_sha="$(<"$SHA_FILE")"
fi
if [[ -z "$recorded_sha" ]]; then
echo "no recorded runner SHA at $SHA_FILE — treating as first restart"
needs_restart=1
elif [[ "$recorded_sha" == "$current_sha" ]]; then
echo "runner already at $current_sha; skipping restart"
exit 0
else
# Look for changes under services/runner/ between recorded and current SHA.
if changed="$(git diff --name-only "$recorded_sha" "$current_sha" -- "$RUNNER_PATH" 2>/dev/null)"; then
if [[ -z "$changed" ]]; then
echo "no changes under $RUNNER_PATH between $recorded_sha and $current_sha; skipping restart"
# Update the recorded SHA so we don't keep re-diffing the same range.
printf '%s\n' "$current_sha" > "$SHA_FILE"
exit 0
fi
needs_restart=1
echo "$RUNNER_PATH changed since last restart:"
echo "$changed" | sed 's/^/ /'
else
echo "could not diff $recorded_sha..$current_sha (commit missing?); treating as needs-restart"
needs_restart=1
fi
fitool=Bash
Bash
exit 0
fi
needs_restart=1
echo "$RUNNER_PATH changed since last restart:"
echo "$changed" | sed 's/^/ /'
else
echo "could not diff $recorded_sha..$current_sha (commit missing?); treating as needs-restart"
needs_restart=1
fi
fi
if [[ "$needs_restart" -eq 1 && "$FORCE" -ne 1 ]]; then
if ! command -v psql >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "psql not available; cannot check active runs. Use --force to override." >&2
exit 3
fi
if [[ -f "$REPO_ROOT/.env" ]]; then
# shellcheck disable=SC1091
set -a; . "$REPO_ROOT/.env"; set +a
fi
conn="${DATABASE_URL_DIRECT:-${DATABASE_URL:-}}"
if [[ -z "$conn" ]]; then
echo "DATABASE_URL[_DIRECT] not set; cannot check active runs. Use --force to override." >&2
exit 3
fi
# Only `running` (a live Claude SDK session) and `deploying` (mid-pod
# dispatch) are real SIGTERM-mid-flight risks. `queued` / `approved` get
# picked back up after restart; `awaiting_approval` is just waiting on
# human input. Don't treat those as blockers.
active_count="$(psql "$conn" -At -c "SELECT count(*) FROM agent_runs WHERE status IN ('running','deploying');" 2>/dev/null || echo "")"
if [[ -z "$active_count" ]]; then
echo "failed to query active runs; refusing without --force" >&2
exit 3
fi
if [[ "$active_count" -gt 0 ]]; then
echo "REFUSING restart: $active_count agent run(s) in flight (running/deploying)." >&2
echo "Wait for them to finish, or pass --force to restart anyway (will SIGTERM in-flight Claude subprocesses)." >&2
exit 4
fi
fi
if [[ "$DRY_RUN" -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "DRY RUN: would restart sagan-runner and record SHA $current_sha"
exit 0
fi
echo "restarting sagan-runner to pick up $current_sha"
sudo systemctl restart sagan-runner
printf '%s\n' "$current_sha" > "$SHA_FILE"
echo "recorded $current_sha in $SHA_FILE"tool=Bash
Bash
86fbb52 runpod: stop the bootstrap → fake-100% → restart loop 3c9f0d1 literature: restore priority on DashboardSuggestedLitItem (build fix) d35dd44 WIP catch-up: agent activity panel, comments revise, runpods routes, narrative editor, dispatcher / session improvements 97c936e feat: improve dashboard collaboration flow ---
tool=Bash
Bash
86fbb52550fee2c74e9dd9130a6f50cf053cb708 2026-05-14 08:36:03 +0000 runpod: stop the bootstrap → fake-100% → restart loop --- de086b5d30487933df4056094241ecb2288f7276 --- 23c60f9df616205abee7696f501cf36d3923eb09
tool=Bash
Bash
---
commit 86fbb52550fee2c74e9dd9130a6f50cf053cb708
Author: Thomas Jiralerspong <thomasjiralerspong@gmail.com>
Date: Thu May 14 08:36:03 2026 +0000
runpod: stop the bootstrap → fake-100% → restart loop
A pod whose bootstrap exits clean (success or fast-fail) used to get auto-
restarted by RunPod because desiredStatus=RUNNING, producing a
bootstrap → 0% → 100% → bootstrap cycle every ~15s. Exp #192 spent 8h in
that state with 7980 progress events and zero real work; #333/#365 didtool=Read
Read
1 import { and, eq, inArray } from 'drizzle-orm';
2 import { db, schema } from './db.js';
3 import { emitEvent, notifyPipelineChanged, notifyQueued } from './queue.js';
4 import { getPod, stopPod, type PodInfo, type RunpodAccount } from './tools/runpod.js';
5 import { log } from './log.js';
6 import { recordTrail } from './trail.js';
7 import { queueAutomaticRecoveryRun } from './lib/agent-recovery.js';
8 import { cascadeAgentRunFailureToScope } from './lib/cascade-failure.js';
9
10 const DEFAULT_WATCH_INTERVAL_MS = 60_000;
11 const ACTIVE_POD_STATUSES = ['deploying', 'running', 'retrying', 'stop_requested'];
12 const TERMINAL_AGENT_STATUSES = ['completed', 'failed', 'cancelled', 'rejected', 'blocked'];
13
14 // Prompt body for the interpreter agent_run queued when all pods on an
15 // experiment report success. Mirrors the qa-step request that
16 // /api/pipeline/advance emits when the owner drags a card running→interpreting,
17 // so the runner's session prompt construction does not need to change.
18 const INTERPRET_REQUEST = [
19 'Moved from running to interpreting on the Pipeline board.',
20 '',
21 'Interpret the current evidence for the scoped experiment. Use the scoped record as the source of truth for title and scope, identify missing artifacts or blockers, and produce the next concrete review note. Do not rename, retitle, or otherwise mutate the scoped issue/experiment.',
22 ].join('\n');
23
24 type PodLifecycleRow = typeof schema.podLifecycle.$inferSelect;
25
26 export function startPodLifecycleWatcher(signal: AbortSignal) {
27 const intervalMs = watchIntervalMs();
28 sweepPodLifecycle().catch((err) => log.error('pod watcher sweep failed', { err: String(err) }));
29
30 const timer = setInterval(() => {
31 sweepPodLifecycle().catch((err) => log.error('pod watcher sweep failed', { err: String(err) }));
32 }, intervalMs);
33
34 signal.addEventListener('abort', () => clearInterval(timer), { once: true });
35 log.info('pod lifecycle watcher started', { intervalMs });
36 }
37
38 export async function sweepPodLifecycle() {
39 const rows = await db()
40 .select()
41 .from(schema.podLifecycle)
42 .where(inArray(schema.podLifecycle.status, ACTIVE_POD_STATUSES))
43 .limit(50);
44
45 for (const row of rows) {
46 await refreshPod(row).catch((err) =>
47 handlePodRefreshError(row, err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err)),
48 );
49 }
50 }
51
52 export async function stopPodsForRun(agentRunId: string) {
53 const rows = await db()
54 .select()
55 .from(schema.podLifecycle)
56 .where(
57 and(
58 eq(schema.podLifecycle.agentRunId, agentRunId),
59 inArray(schema.podLifecycle.status, ['deploying', 'running', 'retrying', 'stop_requested']),
60 ),
61 );
62
63 if (rows.length === 0) {
64 await emitEvent(agentRunId, 'runpod_stop_skipped', 'no active pods found');
65 return;
66 }
67
68 for (const row of rows) {
69 await db()
70 .update(schema.podLifecycle)
71 .set({ status: 'stop_requested', updatedAt: new Date() })
72 .where(eq(schema.podLifecycle.id, row.id));
73 await emitEvent(agentRunId, 'runpod_stop_requested', row.runpodPodId);
74
75 try {
76 const pod = await stopPod(row.runpodPodId, row.account as RunpodAccount);
77 await updatePodFromInfo(row, pod, 'stopped');
78 await emitEvent(agentRunId, 'runpod_stopped', row.runpodPodId, {
79 desiredStatus: pod.desiredStatus,
80 });
81 } catch (err) {
82 const message = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err);
83 await db()
84 .update(schema.podLifecycle)
85 .set({
86 status: 'retrying',
87 lastError: message.slice(0, 4000),
88 updatedAt: new Date(),
89 })
90 .where(eq(schema.podLifecycle.id, row.id));
91 await emitEvent(agentRunId, 'runpod_stop_failed', message.slice(0, 1000));
92 }
93 }
94
95 awai…tool=Bash
Bash
de086b5 2026-05-14 08:16:44 +0000 clean-results: hide the claim panel on the detail page 86fbb52 2026-05-14 08:36:03 +0000 runpod: stop the bootstrap → fake-100% → restart loop 4879ab1 2026-05-14 08:39:30 +0000 mentor daily: clicking a card opens the linked entity, not the summary overlay 23c60f9 2026-05-14 08:52:19 +0000 mentor daily: pull card title from the linked clean_result, not from bodyMd
tool=Bash
Bash
[Unit]
Description=Sagan runner (headless Claude Code)
After=network-online.target
Wants=network-online.target
[Service]
Type=simple
User=thomasjiralerspong
Group=thomasjiralerspong
WorkingDirectory=/home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/services/runner
EnvironmentFile=/home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan/.env
# Run via tsx so we don't need a build step on the VM. Use a login shell so
# corepack's pnpm shim resolves through ~/.local/bin (added by ~/.bashrc).
ExecStart=/bin/bash -lc 'pnpm start'
StandardOutput=journal
StandardError=journal
SyslogIdentifier=sagan-runner
# Restart policy
Restart=always
RestartSec=5
StartLimitIntervalSec=60
StartLimitBurst=10
# Resource caps (generous; runner is mostly waiting on I/O)
LimitNOFILE=65535
MemoryMax=50G
CPUQuota=200%
# Security hardening
NoNewPrivileges=true
PrivateTmp=true
ProtectSystem=full
ProtectHome=read-only
# Writable paths for the runner and its orchestrator subagents:
# - /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan: WorkingDirectory; the runner edits the
# monorepo for self-improvement.
# - /home/thomasjiralerspong/.claude: Claude Agent SDK state (worktrees,
# project transcripts, sub-agent definitions).
# - /home/thomasjiralerspong/.codex: codex CLI session/history/log state
# written by codex-companion when planner runs spawn the codex-critic
# sub-agent. Without this, plan-review codex critics fail with EROFS and
# the planner falls back to Claude-only critique.
# - /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space: the EPS client repo the
# experiment orchestrator's `experiment-implementer` sub-agent commits to
# when driving an experiment from approved → awaiting_promotion. Without
# this, the orchestrator cannot create `issue-<N>` branches or push code
# for the pod to pull, and post-approval runs end in `epm:failure`.
ReadWritePaths=/home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan /home/thomasjiralerspong/.claude /home/thomasjiralerspong/.codex /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
---
PID ELAPSED CMD
3945698 26:20 node /home/thomasjiralerspong/.local/bin/pnpm starttool=Bash
Bash
services/runner/src/watcher.ts:145: if (isSuccessTerminal(row.metadata)) {
services/runner/src/watcher.ts:299:function isSuccessTerminal(metadata: unknown): boolean {tool=Bash
Bash
services/runner/src/lib/followups-watcher.ts:162:// `inArray` is imported above for symmetry with other watchers in this repo;
services/runner/src/index.ts:27:import { startPodLifecycleWatcher, stopPodsForRun } from './watcher.js';
services/runner/src/index.ts:28:import { startFollowupsWatcher } from './lib/followups-watcher.js';
---
services/runner/src/index.ts:27:import { startPodLifecycleWatcher, stopPodsForRun } from './watcher.js';Runner stopped during active session (SIGTERM); queued automatic recovery.
automatic follow-up depth cap reached
Discussion
Comments
No comments yet.