Skip to content
Sagan
experiment

Run 583edc02

auto-recoveryFollow-up of run 910a65d6

The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action.

Original request
[direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#365]
Failure or crash reason
Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team
Previous run transcript
- 2026-05-14T10:39:59.247Z deploy_started: dispatching 4 pod(s)
- 2026-05-14T10:43:32.322Z deploy_pod_started: j18eiux6ccekyj
- 2026-05-14T10:43:32.342Z deploy_pod_started: h0lrn1hg6txfpb
- 2026-05-14T10:43:32.354Z deploy_pod_started: 4ermpldhmdp0za
- 2026-05-14T10:43:32.366Z deploy_pod_started: rotwjcha7r12ns
- 2026-05-14T10:43:32.380Z deploy_completed: dispatched 4/4 pod(s)
- 2026-05-14T10:43:53.879Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:43:54.059Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:43:54.279Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:43:54.502Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:44:54.694Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:44:55.124Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:44:55.314Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:44:56.219Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:45:54.731Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:45:55.033Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:45:55.332Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:45:56.744Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:46:53.809Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:46:53.994Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:46:54.255Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:46:55.299Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:47:53.828Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:47:54.059Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:47:54.281Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:47:55.353Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:48:53.880Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:48:54.303Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:48:54.528Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:48:55.557Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:49:53.814Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:49:54.342Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:49:54.540Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:49:55.615Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:50:53.704Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:50:54.134Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:50:54.352Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:50:55.523Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:51:53.886Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:51:54.255Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:51:54.537Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:51:55.751Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:52:53.838Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:52:54.201Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:52:54.415Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:52:55.315Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:53:55.956Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:53:56.139Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:53:56.641Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:53:57.632Z runpod_status: RUNNING
- 2026-05-14T10:54:53.612Z runpod_retry: Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:54:53.777Z runpod_retry: Pod j18eiux6ccekyj not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:54:53.926Z runpod_retry: Pod 4ermpldhmdp0za not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:54:55.634Z runpod_retry: Pod h0lrn1hg6txfpb not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:55:53.612Z runpod_retry: Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:55:53.755Z runpod_retry: Pod j18eiux6ccekyj not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:55:53.926Z runpod_retry: Pod 4ermpldhmdp0za not found in account=team
- 2026-05-14T10:55:55.076Z runpod_retry: Pod h0lrn1hg6txfpb not found in account=team
Statuscancelled38 events · latest 1324h 39m ago

Resume history

This run resumes 910a65d6.

RunPod lifecycle

Stop requests preserve the attached RunPod volume.

RunPods
jq1txovwi38iqzterminated
GPU
1 x NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB
Rate
$1.49/hr
Spent
$0.01
Runway
runway pending
Uptime
0m
Desired
RUNNING
SSH
204.12.201.57:5025
Retries
0/3
bnspxz4qrwsbfpterminated
GPU
1 x NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB
Rate
$1.49/hr
Spent
$0.01
Runway
runway pending
Uptime
0m
Desired
RUNNING
SSH
154.54.102.42:15462
Retries
0/3
ftghpnckxt581rterminated
GPU
1 x NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB
Rate
$1.49/hr
Spent
$0.01
Runway
runway pending
Uptime
0m
Desired
RUNNING
SSH
-
Retries
0/3
7to8i265ke73o1terminated
GPU
1 x NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB
Rate
$1.49/hr
Spent
$0.01
Runway
runway pending
Uptime
0m
Desired
RUNNING
SSH
-
Retries
0/3
runpod_podpendingrunpod:jq1txovwi38iqz
runpod_podpendingrunpod:bnspxz4qrwsbfp
runpod_podpendingrunpod:ftghpnckxt581r
runpod_podpendingrunpod:7to8i265ke73o1

Plan

Goal

Run one balanced 2^5 factorial across five contested factors that prior single-axis experiments could not disentangle, stratified over three source personas (librarian, surgeon, programmer), and rank which factors actually move `[ZLT]` source-rate and off-diagonal leakage under LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Replaces ad-hoc one-axis sweeps with a single interpretable screen that absorbs the open scope of #361 / #339 / #353 and the still-unrun grid in #46.

Hypothesis

Conditional on the design in the experiment body (96 cells = 3 sources × 32 cells, with seeds 137+256 on the top-3 cells per source), the five factors split into three classes: 1. **Load-bearing (large main effects):** Factor **A** (system-prompt length, short→long) and Factor **E** (loss mask, marker-only→whole-completion) dominate source-rate. A1 raises source-rate; E1 lowers it. Factor **D** (off-policy data) lowers source-rate vs on-policy at matched length. 2. **Non-monotonic / collapsing:** Factor **B** (answer-format length, short→long) collapses source-rate at the long extreme even when system-prompt length is short, replicating #295's null at the long tail. 3. **Near-zero net effect:** Factor **C** (persona vs lexically matched non-persona framing) has near-zero independent main effect on source-rate once A is controlled, but a measurable interaction with A (A×C) carrying most of #337's "persona" signal. For off-diagonal leakage, A1 and E1 both reduce leakage; D1 has the opposite sign to its effect on source-rate.

Prediction

At α=0.05 with question-clustered bootstrap for source-rate and persona-clustered for leakage (per `--bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona`): - |d(A on SR)| ≥ 0.4 averaged across the three source slabs, sign positive. - |d(E on SR)| ≥ 0.3, sign positive for E0 (marker-only) over E1 (whole-completion). - |d(D on SR)| ≥ 0.2, sign positive for D0 (on-policy) over D1 (off-policy). - |d(B on SR)| ≥ 0.3 at the B1 extreme with a non-monotone shape vs B0. - |d(C on SR)| < 0.15 once A is partialled out. - Pre-registered F1×F2 interaction: A×B yields a measurable interaction term (>2× the next-largest interaction) because the question-prefix tokens for B compete with persona-conditioning context from A. Signs and magnitudes are read off pod 3's `main_effects.json` / `interactions.json` after Phase 4 aggregation.

Kill Criterion

Pull the plug — and treat the screen as uninterpretable — if any of the following fires: 1. **Phase 0 pre-screen fails:** base-model contamination on the 24×20×5 eval panel exceeds the pre-registered threshold (`kill_criterion_4_passed=False` in pod 0). Pod 0 raises `SystemExit` and the run aborts. 2. **Phase 1 smoke fails:** the 8-cell resolution-III fractional factorial on librarian returns verdict ≠ `pass` (e.g. uniform near-zero or saturated source-rates across all 8 cells). Indicates the training recipe or marker setup is broken at the level of the librarian source, so the full 32-cell sweep cannot rank factors. 3. **Sign instability across sources:** after Phase 4 aggregation, ≥3 of the 5 main effects flip sign across the three sources. The 5-factor framing is wrong and we re-scope at the persona-class level before any further dispatch. 4. **All main effects below noise:** all 5 main effects have |Cohen's d| < 0.15 for source-rate AND for leakage across all three sources. The screen has no statistical power at this dataset size; we revisit pos/neg counts or LoRA rank before re-running. 5. **Cost overrun:** any single pod exceeds 24 h wall-time (the `phase4-max-wait-seconds` hard cap), or aggregate spend exceeds ~$160 (≈ 1.5× the planned compute estimate below). Operator stops the run and triages. 6. **Recovery-specific bootstrap silence:** if all four pods reach `RUNNING` but emit zero `5% · bootstrap complete` progress notes within 5 min of `RUNNING`, the operator stops the dispatch (suspected bootstrap-wrapper hang or account-credential flake — see Risks §Recovery context). This is the explicit detector for the failure mode that triggered this auto-recovery.

Experimental Setup

Faithful to the body's design and the persisted `pod_spec` on `experiments.077ae4c7-…`, instantiated by the existing `eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen` entry point. - **Branch / commit:** `experiment-365` @ `b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7` (matches the patched `pod_spec` and the `_factor_screen/` module tree currently on disk under `/home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/eps/experiments/`). The runner injects `SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH=experiment-365` and `SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA=b1a24b4b...` so the bootstrap wrapper checks out the exact commit on each pod. - **Model and tooling:** Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, LoRA r=32 α=64, lr=1e-5, 3 epochs. 200 positives + 400 negatives per source. 24-persona × 20-question × 5-completion eval panel with `eval_max_new_tokens=2048`. Clustered bootstrap, question-clustered for source-rate, persona-clustered for leakage. - **Pod topology (4 pods, role-distinct):** - **Pod 0** (`librarian`): Phase 0 base-model contamination pre-screen → Phase 1 res-III smoke → Phase 2 full 32-cell librarian slab at seed 42 → Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 librarian cells (seeds 137, 256). Runs `--run-pre-screen --run-smoke`. - **Pod 1** (`surgeon`): Phase 2 32-cell surgeon slab at seed 42 → Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 surgeon cells. No pre-screen/smoke flags (those gate the whole experiment from pod 0). - **Pod 2** (`programmer`): same shape as pod 1 for the programmer slab. - **Pod 3** (`aggregator-and-overflow`): waits up to 24 h for the three slab `metrics.json` files, then builds `main_effects.json`, `interactions.json`, the persona × cell heatmap, and the clean-result HTML. Runs `--role aggregator-and-overflow --build-figures --write-clean-result --label-f1xf2-preregistered`. - **Pre-registration:** the A×B (system-prompt length × answer-format length) interaction is the one pre-registered two-way; the other nine are reported but labeled exploratory in the aggregator output.

Compute and Hardware

**Topology.** Four pods, each 1× A100 80GB. This is a deliberate, multi-pod array under clause (c) — explicit per-pod role isolation — not the discouraged "one-pod-per-source" anti-pattern: - Pods 0/1/2 are the three source slabs and could in principle batch-share one node, but the script's `--pod-index` / `--source-persona` / `--num-pods` contract (`marker_factor_screen.py:69-79, 153-265`) and pod 0's extra Phase 0/1 gates make them heterogeneous workloads with independent kill criteria. - Pod 3 is a long-running stateful aggregator that polls sibling pods' `metrics.json` until they exist; it must outlive any single training process and runs different code (figure-building, no SFT). It would be wasteful to keep a 4-GPU node alive for the ~24 h aggregator wait. Consolidating to a single 4-GPU node would require an `accelerate`-style rewrite of the entry point that does not exist on `experiment-365`. That rewrite is out of scope for this recovery dispatch and is the right shape for a future ablation. **Time and cost.** - Compute: 4 pods × 1 GPU × 18 h × **$1.49/GPU-hr** (A100 80GB SXM, RunPod Secure Cloud, May 2026 reference rate per the system-prompt rate table) ≈ **$107**. - Storage: 4 × (100 GB volume + 100 GB container disk) × 18 h at $0.10/GB-month ≈ **$2**. - **Total estimated spend ≈ $110** (rounded to two significant figures), with a $160 cost-overrun kill at 1.5×. Rates may drift; the auditor's input is the rate stated here. **Substitution policy delta vs prior dispatch.** The persisted `pod_spec.substitution_policy.account.prefer` was `"team"`. For this recovery dispatch, `prefer` is flipped to `"personal"` because both prior team-account dispatches (`15038ff7…` and the `910a65d6…` whose failure triggered this recovery) hit `Pod not found in account=team` at ~10–15 min after reaching `RUNNING`. The personal account remains in `allowed` so future revisions can swap back once the team-account flake is resolved. The script binds one GPU per pod, so `gpuCount` stays pinned to 1. A100/H100/H200 ≥80 GB are all acceptable; Secure preferred over Community.

Artifacts

- **Per-source pod (0/1/2) under `/workspace/runs/365/pod<i>/<source>/`:** `metrics.json`, LoRA adapters under `adapters/`, `figures/` (per-source heatmap, A×B interaction plot, factor-ranking bar chart). - **Pod 0 extras under `/workspace/runs/365/pod0/`:** `pre_screen.json`, `smoke.json`. - **Pod 3 aggregator under `/workspace/runs/365/pod3/`:** `main_effects.json`, `interactions.json`, `aggregate_metrics.json`, `figures/persona_cell_heatmap.svg`, `figures/factor_ranking.svg`, `figures/AxB_interaction.svg`, `clean_result.html` (the experiment-page `body`). - **Sagan-side:** new `experiments.body` HTML written by `--write-clean-result` and the aggregator figures uploaded as `html_artifact` / `image` figures linked to experiment #365.

Verification

Pre-flight (operator does this before re-dispatch and at first progress-tick): 1. **Spec parity check.** Diff this plan's `runpod-spec` against the persisted `experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec`: identical except for `substitution_policy.account.prefer` (`"team"` → `"personal"`). No other field changes. 2. **Bootstrap progress check.** Within 5 min of each pod reaching `RUNNING`, the runner expects a `5% · bootstrap complete` progress event from each of the four pods. If zero pods emit it (the recovery-trigger failure mode), abort and SSH into one pod to tail `journalctl` and the bootstrap wrapper log before retrying. 3. **Phase 0/1 gates.** Pod 0 must emit `kill_pre_screen` verdict=`passed` and `kill_smoke` verdict=`pass` before pods 1/2/3 are allowed to consume significant compute. The script raises `SystemExit` on failure; the runner surfaces that as a hard stop. Post-run (operator checks before declaring the screen interpretable): 4. `main_effects.json` reports five main effects with bootstrap CIs and Cohen's d for both source-rate and leakage. All three sources represented in the underlying slab summaries. 5. `interactions.json` reports all ten two-way interactions with the A×B row carrying a `pre_registered: true` flag. 6. `clean_result.html` follows `docs/clean-result-guidelines.md` (TL;DR → primary plot → Experimental design dropdown) and is attached to `experiments.body` on experiment #365.

Risks and Red Team

**Risk 1 — multi-pod partial-dispatch sensitivity.** Per the system prompt, partial dispatch of a multi-pod array is treated as a hard failure; this is what happened at 08:56 (2/4 came up). The substitution policy below allows the provisioner to fall back to community cloud or back to the team account; if capacity is still tight, the operator should consider running pod 0 alone as a 1-pod smoke before fanning out. **Risk 2 — recurring team-account vanishing (the recovery trigger).** Two prior team-account dispatches (`15038ff7…` and `910a65d6…`) hit `Pod not found in account=team` 10–15 min after all four pods reported `RUNNING`. Root cause is still ambiguous (team-account credentials event vs. bootstrap-wrapper hang vs. RunPod team-account inventory drift). This recovery dispatch flips `account.prefer` to `personal` so we exercise a different surface. If the same vanishing fires under `personal`, the failure is upstream of the account choice and the operator should SSH into one pod to tail `journalctl` / wrapper logs before any further retry, per the prior planner's recommendation. Verification step 2 is the explicit detector. **Risk 3 — single-seed factor ranks.** Most cells run at seed 42 only; multi-seed coverage is restricted to the top-3 per source. A factor ranked 2nd or 3rd whose true effect is borderline could swap with a 4th-ranked factor under seed noise. We accept this risk because broadening multi-seed to all 32×3 cells multiplies compute by 3× and is out of cost scope. **Risk 4 — F1×F2 pre-registration vs the other 9 interactions.** With 10 two-way interactions reported and a single one pre-registered, multiple-comparison hygiene matters. The aggregator labels exploratory interactions accordingly; we do not claim significance for any exploratory interaction without a confirmatory experiment. **Risk 5 — A/B confound on user-message tokens.** Even though B is induced by a natural format instruction, the instruction tokens still live inside the user message and could shift attention patterns independent of completion length. This is a genuine confound the screen cannot fully separate; the A×B interaction term is the diagnostic and is pre-registered for that reason. **Critique loop notes.** This is a re-finalization of an owner-approved design (the planJson is fully populated and the design body has been stable across multiple rounds). The scientific design is unchanged from the prior approved plan; the only delta is `runpod-spec.substitution_policy.account.prefer` flipping from `"team"` to `"personal"` plus the corresponding addition of kill criterion #6 (bootstrap-silence detector) and Verification step 2. I ran the consistency check internally rather than the full paired-critic loop because (a) the design is owner-approved, (b) the open question is purely whether the `runpod-spec` matches the patched DB state and the script's CLI contract, and (c) the script's `parse_args` (`marker_factor_screen.py:62-138`) was re-verified against each pod's `dockerArgs`. Loops run: 0 (re-finalize); merged verdict: pass for methodology, statistics, and alternative-explanations because no design field changed; no follow-ups intentionally dropped. If a future revision changes any scientific field, that revision should re-enter the full paired-critic loop.

Likely Clean Result

A `body` HTML on experiment #365 following `docs/clean-result-guidelines.md`: - **TL;DR (single paragraph in first person):** "I ran a balanced 2^5 factorial across five marker-implantation factors on three source personas. System-prompt length and loss-mask scope were the two load-bearing knobs, both with Cohen's d > 0.4 on source-rate; persona framing had near-zero independent effect once length was controlled, confirming #340. Long answer-format prompts collapsed source-rate at the extreme, replicating #295. Off-policy data lost ~0.2 d of source-rate vs on-policy at matched length." - **Primary plot:** a single bar chart of the five main-effect Cohen's d's on source-rate with 95% bootstrap CIs, ordered largest-to-smallest, with plain-English axis labels ("system-prompt length", "loss masks marker only", etc.) and SVG `<title>` hover tooltips carrying the underlying mean and CI. - **Experimental design dropdown:** the 32-cell factor table, the 3-source stratification, the seed plan, the bootstrap scheme, and the kill-criterion list — collapsed by default. Sections deliberately omitted per the clean-result guidelines: separate Background / Methodology h2s, standing caveats, references to the abandoned single-axis sweeps, and the additional per-source heatmaps (those live as linked figures, not in the body).

Approval Checklist

- [x] **Goal** matches the experiment record title and absorbs the open scope of #361 / #339 / #353 / #46. - [x] **Hypothesis** is specific: five factors split into three classes with signed predictions for each. - [x] **Prediction** is falsifiable: numeric Cohen's d thresholds with α=0.05 and a named bootstrap scheme. - [x] **Kill criterion** has six concrete triggers, including the new bootstrap-silence detector that directly responds to the recovery-trigger failure mode. - [x] **Compute and Hardware** estimates 4 × 1 × 18 h × $1.49 ≈ $107 compute + ~$2 storage = **~$110 total** at A100 80GB SXM Secure Cloud rates; cost-overrun kill at $160. Multi-pod array is justified under clause (c) per-pod role isolation; consolidation deferred to a future ablation. - [x] **Artifacts** enumerated per-pod and aggregator with `/workspace/runs/365/...` paths matching the script's directory contract. - [x] **Verification** covers spec parity, the bootstrap-progress detector, Phase 0/1 kill gates, and the aggregator's required JSONs / clean-result HTML. - [x] **Risks** explicitly cover the team-account vanishing failure that triggered this recovery and document the rationale for flipping `account.prefer` to `personal`. - [x] **Likely clean result** follows `docs/clean-result-guidelines.md` (TL;DR → primary plot → design dropdown, first-person voice, no standing caveats). - [x] **`runpod-spec` matches the plan**: 4 pods, A100 80GB Secure Cloud preferred, single-GPU per pod, `account.prefer=personal` with `team` retained in `allowed`, and per-pod `dockerArgs` identical to the persisted `experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec` save for that one substitution-policy field. ```runpod-spec [ { "name": "marker-screen-365-pod0-pre-and-source-librarian", "gpuType": "A100", "gpuCount": 1, "volumeGb": 100, "containerDiskGb": 100, "cloudType": "SECURE", "estimatedMinutes": 1080, "env": { "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365", "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7" }, "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 0 --num-pods 4 --source-persona librarian --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --run-pre-screen --run-smoke --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'", "config": { "command": "Pod 0: Phase 0 base-model contamination pre-screen on 24x20x5 eval panel + Phase 1 8-cell res-III librarian smoke (kill gates only) + Phase 2 32-cell librarian slab at primary seed + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 librarian cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).", "artifacts": [ "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/pre_screen.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/smoke.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/metrics.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/adapters/", "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/figures/" ] }, "substitution_policy": { "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 }, "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 }, "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" }, "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" }, "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" }, "volumeGb": { "min": 100 }, "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 } }, "consolidation": { "may_merge_pods": false, "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1 } }, { "name": "marker-screen-365-pod1-source-surgeon", "gpuType": "A100", "gpuCount": 1, "volumeGb": 100, "containerDiskGb": 100, "cloudType": "SECURE", "estimatedMinutes": 1080, "env": { "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365", "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7" }, "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 1 --num-pods 4 --source-persona surgeon --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'", "config": { "command": "Pod 1: Phase 2 32-cell surgeon slab at primary seed 42 + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 surgeon cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).", "artifacts": [ "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/surgeon/metrics.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/surgeon/adapters/", "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/figures/" ] }, "substitution_policy": { "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 }, "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 }, "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" }, "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" }, "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" }, "volumeGb": { "min": 100 }, "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 } }, "consolidation": { "may_merge_pods": false, "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1 } }, { "name": "marker-screen-365-pod2-source-programmer", "gpuType": "A100", "gpuCount": 1, "volumeGb": 100, "containerDiskGb": 100, "cloudType": "SECURE", "estimatedMinutes": 1080, "env": { "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365", "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7" }, "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 2 --num-pods 4 --source-persona programmer --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'", "config": { "command": "Pod 2: Phase 2 32-cell programmer slab at primary seed 42 + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 programmer cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).", "artifacts": [ "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/programmer/metrics.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/programmer/adapters/", "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/figures/" ] }, "substitution_policy": { "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 }, "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 }, "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" }, "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" }, "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" }, "volumeGb": { "min": 100 }, "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 } }, "consolidation": { "may_merge_pods": false, "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1 } }, { "name": "marker-screen-365-pod3-aggregator-and-overflow", "gpuType": "A100", "gpuCount": 1, "volumeGb": 100, "containerDiskGb": 100, "cloudType": "SECURE", "estimatedMinutes": 1080, "env": { "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365", "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7" }, "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 3 --num-pods 4 --role aggregator-and-overflow --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --build-figures --write-clean-result --label-f1xf2-preregistered --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'", "config": { "command": "Pod 3: Phase 4 aggregator. Waits up to 24h for pods 0/1/2 metrics.json files, then builds main_effects.json, interactions.json (with A x B pre-registered), the persona x cell heatmap, the factor-ranking bar chart, the A x B interaction plot, and the clean-result HTML attached to experiments.body.", "artifacts": [ "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/main_effects.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/interactions.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/aggregate_metrics.json", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/persona_cell_heatmap.svg", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/factor_ranking.svg", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/AxB_interaction.svg", "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/clean_result.html" ] }, "substitution_policy": { "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 }, "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 }, "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" }, "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" }, "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" }, "volumeGb": { "min": 100 }, "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 } }, "consolidation": { "may_merge_pods": false, "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1 } } ] ``` **Recovery summary.** Diagnosed the failure as the recurring team-account post-RUNNING vanishing (Risk 2 from the prior plan). Re-emitted the owner-approved 4-pod plan unchanged except for: (1) `substitution_policy.account.prefer` flipped from `team` to `personal`; (2) kill criterion #6 added as an explicit detector for the same failure mode under the new account; (3) Verification step 2 documents the 5-min bootstrap-progress check. The persisted `experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec` already has `personal` in `account.allowed`, so this is a scope-preserving recovery, not a design change.

I have enough context. The previous direct-dispatch failed because all 4 RunPod pods successfully reached RUNNING on the team account, then simultaneously disappeared from inventory ~11 min later — the exact recurring failure mode the prior planner flagged as Risk 2. The persisted substitution_policy already allows personal as a fallback, but prefer="team" keeps re-dispatching into the failing surface. The minimal scope-preserving fix is to flip account.prefer to personal for this recovery dispatch and re-emit the otherwise unchanged owner-approved plan.

Goal

Run one balanced 2^5 factorial across five contested factors that prior single-axis experiments could not disentangle, stratified over three source personas (librarian, surgeon, programmer), and rank which factors actually move [ZLT] source-rate and off-diagonal leakage under LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Replaces ad-hoc one-axis sweeps with a single interpretable screen that absorbs the open scope of #361 / #339 / #353 and the still-unrun grid in #46.

Hypothesis

Conditional on the design in the experiment body (96 cells = 3 sources × 32 cells, with seeds 137+256 on the top-3 cells per source), the five factors split into three classes:

  1. Load-bearing (large main effects): Factor A (system-prompt length, short→long) and Factor E (loss mask, marker-only→whole-completion) dominate source-rate. A1 raises source-rate; E1 lowers it. Factor D (off-policy data) lowers source-rate vs on-policy at matched length.
  2. Non-monotonic / collapsing: Factor B (answer-format length, short→long) collapses source-rate at the long extreme even when system-prompt length is short, replicating #295's null at the long tail.
  3. Near-zero net effect: Factor C (persona vs lexically matched non-persona framing) has near-zero independent main effect on source-rate once A is controlled, but a measurable interaction with A (A×C) carrying most of #337's "persona" signal.

For off-diagonal leakage, A1 and E1 both reduce leakage; D1 has the opposite sign to its effect on source-rate.

Prediction

At α=0.05 with question-clustered bootstrap for source-rate and persona-clustered for leakage (per --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona):

  • |d(A on SR)| ≥ 0.4 averaged across the three source slabs, sign positive.
  • |d(E on SR)| ≥ 0.3, sign positive for E0 (marker-only) over E1 (whole-completion).
  • |d(D on SR)| ≥ 0.2, sign positive for D0 (on-policy) over D1 (off-policy).
  • |d(B on SR)| ≥ 0.3 at the B1 extreme with a non-monotone shape vs B0.
  • |d(C on SR)| < 0.15 once A is partialled out.
  • Pre-registered F1×F2 interaction: A×B yields a measurable interaction term (>2× the next-largest interaction) because the question-prefix tokens for B compete with persona-conditioning context from A.

Signs and magnitudes are read off pod 3's main_effects.json / interactions.json after Phase 4 aggregation.

Kill Criterion

Pull the plug — and treat the screen as uninterpretable — if any of the following fires:

  1. Phase 0 pre-screen fails: base-model contamination on the 24×20×5 eval panel exceeds the pre-registered threshold (kill_criterion_4_passed=False in pod 0). Pod 0 raises SystemExit and the run aborts.
  2. Phase 1 smoke fails: the 8-cell resolution-III fractional factorial on librarian returns verdict ≠ pass (e.g. uniform near-zero or saturated source-rates across all 8 cells). Indicates the training recipe or marker setup is broken at the level of the librarian source, so the full 32-cell sweep cannot rank factors.
  3. Sign instability across sources: after Phase 4 aggregation, ≥3 of the 5 main effects flip sign across the three sources. The 5-factor framing is wrong and we re-scope at the persona-class level before any further dispatch.
  4. All main effects below noise: all 5 main effects have |Cohen's d| < 0.15 for source-rate AND for leakage across all three sources. The screen has no statistical power at this dataset size; we revisit pos/neg counts or LoRA rank before re-running.
  5. Cost overrun: any single pod exceeds 24 h wall-time (the phase4-max-wait-seconds hard cap), or aggregate spend exceeds ~$160 (≈ 1.5× the planned compute estimate below). Operator stops the run and triages.
  6. Recovery-specific bootstrap silence: if all four pods reach RUNNING but emit zero 5% · bootstrap complete progress notes within 5 min of RUNNING, the operator stops the dispatch (suspected bootstrap-wrapper hang or account-credential flake — see Risks §Recovery context). This is the explicit detector for the failure mode that triggered this auto-recovery.

Experimental Setup

Faithful to the body's design and the persisted pod_spec on experiments.077ae4c7-…, instantiated by the existing eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen entry point.

  • Branch / commit: experiment-365 @ b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7 (matches the patched pod_spec and the _factor_screen/ module tree currently on disk under /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/eps/experiments/). The runner injects SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH=experiment-365 and SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA=b1a24b4b... so the bootstrap wrapper checks out the exact commit on each pod.
  • Model and tooling: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, LoRA r=32 α=64, lr=1e-5, 3 epochs. 200 positives + 400 negatives per source. 24-persona × 20-question × 5-completion eval panel with eval_max_new_tokens=2048. Clustered bootstrap, question-clustered for source-rate, persona-clustered for leakage.
  • Pod topology (4 pods, role-distinct):
    • Pod 0 (librarian): Phase 0 base-model contamination pre-screen → Phase 1 res-III smoke → Phase 2 full 32-cell librarian slab at seed 42 → Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 librarian cells (seeds 137, 256). Runs --run-pre-screen --run-smoke.
    • Pod 1 (surgeon): Phase 2 32-cell surgeon slab at seed 42 → Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 surgeon cells. No pre-screen/smoke flags (those gate the whole experiment from pod 0).
    • Pod 2 (programmer): same shape as pod 1 for the programmer slab.
    • Pod 3 (aggregator-and-overflow): waits up to 24 h for the three slab metrics.json files, then builds main_effects.json, interactions.json, the persona × cell heatmap, and the clean-result HTML. Runs --role aggregator-and-overflow --build-figures --write-clean-result --label-f1xf2-preregistered.
  • Pre-registration: the A×B (system-prompt length × answer-format length) interaction is the one pre-registered two-way; the other nine are reported but labeled exploratory in the aggregator output.

Compute and Hardware

Topology. Four pods, each 1× A100 80GB. This is a deliberate, multi-pod array under clause (c) — explicit per-pod role isolation — not the discouraged "one-pod-per-source" anti-pattern:

  • Pods 0/1/2 are the three source slabs and could in principle batch-share one node, but the script's --pod-index / --source-persona / --num-pods contract (marker_factor_screen.py:69-79, 153-265) and pod 0's extra Phase 0/1 gates make them heterogeneous workloads with independent kill criteria.
  • Pod 3 is a long-running stateful aggregator that polls sibling pods' metrics.json until they exist; it must outlive any single training process and runs different code (figure-building, no SFT). It would be wasteful to keep a 4-GPU node alive for the ~24 h aggregator wait.

Consolidating to a single 4-GPU node would require an accelerate-style rewrite of the entry point that does not exist on experiment-365. That rewrite is out of scope for this recovery dispatch and is the right shape for a future ablation.

Time and cost.

  • Compute: 4 pods × 1 GPU × 18 h × $1.49/GPU-hr (A100 80GB SXM, RunPod Secure Cloud, May 2026 reference rate per the system-prompt rate table) ≈ $107.
  • Storage: 4 × (100 GB volume + 100 GB container disk) × 18 h at $0.10/GB-month ≈ $2.
  • Total estimated spend ≈ $110 (rounded to two significant figures), with a $160 cost-overrun kill at 1.5×.

Rates may drift; the auditor's input is the rate stated here.

Substitution policy delta vs prior dispatch. The persisted pod_spec.substitution_policy.account.prefer was "team". For this recovery dispatch, prefer is flipped to "personal" because both prior team-account dispatches (15038ff7… and the 910a65d6… whose failure triggered this recovery) hit Pod not found in account=team at ~10–15 min after reaching RUNNING. The personal account remains in allowed so future revisions can swap back once the team-account flake is resolved. The script binds one GPU per pod, so gpuCount stays pinned to 1. A100/H100/H200 ≥80 GB are all acceptable; Secure preferred over Community.

Artifacts

  • Per-source pod (0/1/2) under /workspace/runs/365/pod<i>/<source>/: metrics.json, LoRA adapters under adapters/, figures/ (per-source heatmap, A×B interaction plot, factor-ranking bar chart).
  • Pod 0 extras under /workspace/runs/365/pod0/: pre_screen.json, smoke.json.
  • Pod 3 aggregator under /workspace/runs/365/pod3/: main_effects.json, interactions.json, aggregate_metrics.json, figures/persona_cell_heatmap.svg, figures/factor_ranking.svg, figures/AxB_interaction.svg, clean_result.html (the experiment-page body).
  • Sagan-side: new experiments.body HTML written by --write-clean-result and the aggregator figures uploaded as html_artifact / image figures linked to experiment #365.

Verification

Pre-flight (operator does this before re-dispatch and at first progress-tick):

  1. Spec parity check. Diff this plan's runpod-spec against the persisted experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec: identical except for substitution_policy.account.prefer ("team""personal"). No other field changes.
  2. Bootstrap progress check. Within 5 min of each pod reaching RUNNING, the runner expects a 5% · bootstrap complete progress event from each of the four pods. If zero pods emit it (the recovery-trigger failure mode), abort and SSH into one pod to tail journalctl and the bootstrap wrapper log before retrying.
  3. Phase 0/1 gates. Pod 0 must emit kill_pre_screen verdict=passed and kill_smoke verdict=pass before pods 1/2/3 are allowed to consume significant compute. The script raises SystemExit on failure; the runner surfaces that as a hard stop.

Post-run (operator checks before declaring the screen interpretable):

  1. main_effects.json reports five main effects with bootstrap CIs and Cohen's d for both source-rate and leakage. All three sources represented in the underlying slab summaries.
  2. interactions.json reports all ten two-way interactions with the A×B row carrying a pre_registered: true flag.
  3. clean_result.html follows docs/clean-result-guidelines.md (TL;DR → primary plot → Experimental design dropdown) and is attached to experiments.body on experiment #365.

Risks and Red Team

Risk 1 — multi-pod partial-dispatch sensitivity. Per the system prompt, partial dispatch of a multi-pod array is treated as a hard failure; this is what happened at 08:56 (2/4 came up). The substitution policy below allows the provisioner to fall back to community cloud or back to the team account; if capacity is still tight, the operator should consider running pod 0 alone as a 1-pod smoke before fanning out.

Risk 2 — recurring team-account vanishing (the recovery trigger). Two prior team-account dispatches (15038ff7… and 910a65d6…) hit Pod not found in account=team 10–15 min after all four pods reported RUNNING. Root cause is still ambiguous (team-account credentials event vs. bootstrap-wrapper hang vs. RunPod team-account inventory drift). This recovery dispatch flips account.prefer to personal so we exercise a different surface. If the same vanishing fires under personal, the failure is upstream of the account choice and the operator should SSH into one pod to tail journalctl / wrapper logs before any further retry, per the prior planner's recommendation. Verification step 2 is the explicit detector.

Risk 3 — single-seed factor ranks. Most cells run at seed 42 only; multi-seed coverage is restricted to the top-3 per source. A factor ranked 2nd or 3rd whose true effect is borderline could swap with a 4th-ranked factor under seed noise. We accept this risk because broadening multi-seed to all 32×3 cells multiplies compute by 3× and is out of cost scope.

Risk 4 — F1×F2 pre-registration vs the other 9 interactions. With 10 two-way interactions reported and a single one pre-registered, multiple-comparison hygiene matters. The aggregator labels exploratory interactions accordingly; we do not claim significance for any exploratory interaction without a confirmatory experiment.

Risk 5 — A/B confound on user-message tokens. Even though B is induced by a natural format instruction, the instruction tokens still live inside the user message and could shift attention patterns independent of completion length. This is a genuine confound the screen cannot fully separate; the A×B interaction term is the diagnostic and is pre-registered for that reason.

Critique loop notes. This is a re-finalization of an owner-approved design (the planJson is fully populated and the design body has been stable across multiple rounds). The scientific design is unchanged from the prior approved plan; the only delta is runpod-spec.substitution_policy.account.prefer flipping from "team" to "personal" plus the corresponding addition of kill criterion #6 (bootstrap-silence detector) and Verification step 2. I ran the consistency check internally rather than the full paired-critic loop because (a) the design is owner-approved, (b) the open question is purely whether the runpod-spec matches the patched DB state and the script's CLI contract, and (c) the script's parse_args (marker_factor_screen.py:62-138) was re-verified against each pod's dockerArgs. Loops run: 0 (re-finalize); merged verdict: pass for methodology, statistics, and alternative-explanations because no design field changed; no follow-ups intentionally dropped. If a future revision changes any scientific field, that revision should re-enter the full paired-critic loop.

Likely Clean Result

A body HTML on experiment #365 following docs/clean-result-guidelines.md:

  • TL;DR (single paragraph in first person): "I ran a balanced 2^5 factorial across five marker-implantation factors on three source personas. System-prompt length and loss-mask scope were the two load-bearing knobs, both with Cohen's d > 0.4 on source-rate; persona framing had near-zero independent effect once length was controlled, confirming #340. Long answer-format prompts collapsed source-rate at the extreme, replicating #295. Off-policy data lost ~0.2 d of source-rate vs on-policy at matched length."
  • Primary plot: a single bar chart of the five main-effect Cohen's d's on source-rate with 95% bootstrap CIs, ordered largest-to-smallest, with plain-English axis labels ("system-prompt length", "loss masks marker only", etc.) and SVG <title> hover tooltips carrying the underlying mean and CI.
  • Experimental design dropdown: the 32-cell factor table, the 3-source stratification, the seed plan, the bootstrap scheme, and the kill-criterion list — collapsed by default.

Sections deliberately omitted per the clean-result guidelines: separate Background / Methodology h2s, standing caveats, references to the abandoned single-axis sweeps, and the additional per-source heatmaps (those live as linked figures, not in the body).

Approval Checklist

  • Goal matches the experiment record title and absorbs the open scope of #361 / #339 / #353 / #46.
  • Hypothesis is specific: five factors split into three classes with signed predictions for each.
  • Prediction is falsifiable: numeric Cohen's d thresholds with α=0.05 and a named bootstrap scheme.
  • Kill criterion has six concrete triggers, including the new bootstrap-silence detector that directly responds to the recovery-trigger failure mode.
  • Compute and Hardware estimates 4 × 1 × 18 h × $1.49 ≈ $107 compute + ~$2 storage = ~$110 total at A100 80GB SXM Secure Cloud rates; cost-overrun kill at $160. Multi-pod array is justified under clause (c) per-pod role isolation; consolidation deferred to a future ablation.
  • Artifacts enumerated per-pod and aggregator with /workspace/runs/365/... paths matching the script's directory contract.
  • Verification covers spec parity, the bootstrap-progress detector, Phase 0/1 kill gates, and the aggregator's required JSONs / clean-result HTML.
  • Risks explicitly cover the team-account vanishing failure that triggered this recovery and document the rationale for flipping account.prefer to personal.
  • Likely clean result follows docs/clean-result-guidelines.md (TL;DR → primary plot → design dropdown, first-person voice, no standing caveats).
  • runpod-spec matches the plan: 4 pods, A100 80GB Secure Cloud preferred, single-GPU per pod, account.prefer=personal with team retained in allowed, and per-pod dockerArgs identical to the persisted experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec save for that one substitution-policy field.
[
  {
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod0-pre-and-source-librarian",
    "gpuType": "A100",
    "gpuCount": 1,
    "volumeGb": 100,
    "containerDiskGb": 100,
    "cloudType": "SECURE",
    "estimatedMinutes": 1080,
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 0 --num-pods 4 --source-persona librarian --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --run-pre-screen --run-smoke --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 0: Phase 0 base-model contamination pre-screen on 24x20x5 eval panel + Phase 1 8-cell res-III librarian smoke (kill gates only) + Phase 2 32-cell librarian slab at primary seed + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 librarian cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/pre_screen.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/smoke.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/metrics.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/adapters/",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/figures/"
      ]
    },
    "substitution_policy": {
      "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 },
      "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 },
      "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" },
      "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" },
      "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" },
      "volumeGb": { "min": 100 },
      "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 }
    },
    "consolidation": {
      "may_merge_pods": false,
      "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1
    }
  },
  {
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod1-source-surgeon",
    "gpuType": "A100",
    "gpuCount": 1,
    "volumeGb": 100,
    "containerDiskGb": 100,
    "cloudType": "SECURE",
    "estimatedMinutes": 1080,
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 1 --num-pods 4 --source-persona surgeon --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 1: Phase 2 32-cell surgeon slab at primary seed 42 + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 surgeon cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/surgeon/metrics.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/surgeon/adapters/",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod1/figures/"
      ]
    },
    "substitution_policy": {
      "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 },
      "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 },
      "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" },
      "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" },
      "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" },
      "volumeGb": { "min": 100 },
      "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 }
    },
    "consolidation": {
      "may_merge_pods": false,
      "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1
    }
  },
  {
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod2-source-programmer",
    "gpuType": "A100",
    "gpuCount": 1,
    "volumeGb": 100,
    "containerDiskGb": 100,
    "cloudType": "SECURE",
    "estimatedMinutes": 1080,
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 2 --num-pods 4 --source-persona programmer --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 2: Phase 2 32-cell programmer slab at primary seed 42 + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 programmer cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/programmer/metrics.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/programmer/adapters/",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod2/figures/"
      ]
    },
    "substitution_policy": {
      "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 },
      "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 },
      "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" },
      "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" },
      "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" },
      "volumeGb": { "min": 100 },
      "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 }
    },
    "consolidation": {
      "may_merge_pods": false,
      "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1
    }
  },
  {
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod3-aggregator-and-overflow",
    "gpuType": "A100",
    "gpuCount": 1,
    "volumeGb": 100,
    "containerDiskGb": 100,
    "cloudType": "SECURE",
    "estimatedMinutes": 1080,
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 3 --num-pods 4 --role aggregator-and-overflow --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --build-figures --write-clean-result --label-f1xf2-preregistered --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 3: Phase 4 aggregator. Waits up to 24h for pods 0/1/2 metrics.json files, then builds main_effects.json, interactions.json (with A x B pre-registered), the persona x cell heatmap, the factor-ranking bar chart, the A x B interaction plot, and the clean-result HTML attached to experiments.body.",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/main_effects.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/interactions.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/aggregate_metrics.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/persona_cell_heatmap.svg",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/factor_ranking.svg",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/figures/AxB_interaction.svg",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod3/clean_result.html"
      ]
    },
    "substitution_policy": {
      "gpuType": { "allowed": ["A100", "A100-SXM", "H100", "H200"], "min_vram_gb": 80 },
      "gpuCount": { "min": 1, "max": 1 },
      "cloudType": { "allowed": ["SECURE", "COMMUNITY"], "prefer": "SECURE" },
      "dataCenterId": { "allowed": "any" },
      "account": { "allowed": ["personal", "team"], "prefer": "personal" },
      "volumeGb": { "min": 100 },
      "containerDiskGb": { "min": 100 }
    },
    "consolidation": {
      "may_merge_pods": false,
      "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1
    }
  }
]

Recovery summary. Diagnosed the failure as the recurring team-account post-RUNNING vanishing (Risk 2 from the prior plan). Re-emitted the owner-approved 4-pod plan unchanged except for: (1) substitution_policy.account.prefer flipped from team to personal; (2) kill criterion #6 added as an explicit detector for the same failure mode under the new account; (3) Verification step 2 documents the 5-min bootstrap-progress check. The persisted experiments.077ae4c7…pod_spec already has personal in account.allowed, so this is a scope-preserving recovery, not a design change.

Events

10:56:53 AMstartedagent
kind=experiment
10:57:13 AMassistant_textagent
I'll diagnose the failure and produce a complete plan with a runpod-spec that mitigates the team-account vanishing issue.
10:57:15 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:15 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:17 AMtool_resulttools
__init__.py
__pycache__
_factor_screen
_progress.py
marker_factor_screen.py
10:57:18 AMtool_resulttools
b1a24b4b Address code-review round 1 targeted fixes for experiment #365
6f37dc79 Add eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen for Sagan experiment #365
125e78f8 Add TrainLoraConfig.backend flag scaffold for Unsloth adoption
a4652b62 Route EPS workflow state through Sagan
4129f88d Add Sagan pod progress reporting guidance
b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
10:57:22 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:25 AMtool_resulttools
12:* Phase 2 (pods 0/1/2 with ``--source-persona``): full 2^5 = 32 cells at
28:import argparse
62:def parse_args(argv: list[str] | None = None) -> argparse.Namespace:
63:    p = argparse.ArgumentParser(
69:    p.add_argument("--pod-index", type=int, default=0)
70:    p.add_argument("--num-pods", type=int, default=4)
71:    p.add_argument(
79:    p.add_argument("--source-persona", type=str, default=None, choices=(*SOURCE_PERSONAS, None))
80:    p.add_argument("--base-model", type=str, default="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct")
81:    p.add_argument("--intent", type=str, default="lora-7b")
84:    p.add_argument("--lora-r", type=int, default=32)
85:    p.add_argument("--lora-alpha", type=int, default=64)
86:    p.add_argument("--lr", type=float, default=1e-5)
87:    p.add_argument("--epochs", type=int, default=3)
90:    p.add_argument("--pos-per-source", type=int, default=200)
91:    p.add_argument("--neg-per-source", type=int, default=400)
94:    p.add_argument("--eval-personas", type=int, default=24)
95:    p.add_argument("--eval-questions", type=int, default=20)
96:    p.add_argument("--eval-completions", type=int, default=5)
97:    p.add_argument("--eval-max-new-tokens", type=int, default=2048)
100:    p.add_argument("--primary-seed", type=int, default=42)
101:    p.add_argument("--multi-seeds", type=_csv_ints, default=[137, 256])
105:    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-scheme", type=str, default="clustered")
106:    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-cluster-sr", type=str, default="question")
107:    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-cluster-lr", type=str, default="persona")
110:    p.add_argument("--run-pre-screen", action="store_true")
111:    p.add_argument("--run-smoke", action="store_true")
112:    p.add_argument("--build-figures", action="store_true")
113:    p.add_argument("--write-clean-result", action="store_true")
114:    p.add_argument("--label-f1xf2-preregistered", action="store_true")
117:    p.add_argument("--progress-url", type=str, default=None)
118:    p.add_argument("--progress-token", type=str, default=None)
119:    p.add_argument("--agent-run-id", type=str, default=None)
120:    p.add_argument("--experiment-id", type=str, default=None)
121:    p.add_argument("--run-index", type=int, default=0)
124:    p.add_argument("--wandb-project", type=str, default=os.environ.get("WANDB_PROJECT"))
127:    p.add_argument(
141:def _pod_dir(args: argparse.Namespace) -> Path:
153:def _is_aggregator(args: argparse.Namespace) -> bool:
160:def _dispatch_source_slab(args: argparse.Namespace) -> dict:
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
10:57:25 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:28 AMtool_resulttools
{"experiment":{"id":"077ae4c7-e816-4dd8-a150-ad8fe19cb795","number":365,"legacyGhNumber":null,"beliefId":null,"projectId":null,"title":"Factor screen for marker implantation + leakage (2^5: system-prompt length, answer-format length, persona-presence, on-policy, marker-only-loss)","body":"## Motivation\n\nWe want a single experiment that ranks the dominant factors controlling **marker implantation** (source `[ZLT]` rate) and **marker leakage** (mean off-diagonal rate) under LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Five prior issues varied one axis at a time, with conflicting or co-linear results:\n\n- [#337](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/337) (MODERATE) — longer persona system prompts on the 48-source panel implant more (ρ=+0.38) and leak less (ρ=−0.38), but length and persona-richness co-vary.\n- [#295](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/295) (LOW) — stretching completion length / turn count on a fixed librarian source collapses uptake to 0/100 at the longest setting.\n- [#340](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/340) (MODERATE) — persona-to-assistant cosine has zero independent signal once prompt length is partialled out.\n- [#181](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/181) / [#208](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/208) — non-persona triggers leak broadly under any recipe.\n- [#46](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/46) (approved, not yet run) — on-policy + marker-only-loss 5×3×3 grid.\n\nCo-linearity in the natural-variation panel means we can't tell which knob is load-bearing without a factorial. This issue runs **one** balanced 2^5 factorial that crosses five contested axes, stratified across a small panel of source personas so we can see whether main effects are persona-stable. System-prompt length and answer-format-induced completion length are varied independently. The completion-length arm stays on-policy by changing only a natural response-format instruction attached to the same semantic user question (one sentence vs short essay), while the system prompt, marker placement, data policy, and loss mask are held fixed by the other factors. It absorbs the open proposed children #361, #339, #353.\n\n## Factors (2 levels each, 32 cells per source persona)\n\n| Factor | Level 0 (baseline) | Level 1 (treatment) | Open question |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **A. System-prompt length** | short system prompt (~6–20 tokens) | long system prompt (~1000 tokens) | Tests [#337](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/337)'s system-prompt-length effect without tying it to completion length. |\n| **B. Answer-format length** | same semantic question + short-format instruction (e.g. \"Answer in one sentence.\", ~50 tokens before `[ZLT]`) | same semantic question + long-format instruction (e.g. \"Answer as a short essay with several paragraphs.\", ~1050 tokens before `[ZLT]`) | Induces short vs long completions through a natural user-message format instruction so D0 remains genuinely on-policy; tests [#295](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/295) independently of system-prompt length. |\n| **C. Persona framing** at matched system-prompt length | role/persona framing (e.g. `You are a librarian who helps people find information and manages a public library.`) | lexically matched non-persona context framing (e.g. `Background context: librarians help people find information and manage public libraries. Answer neutrally and directly.`) | Tests role adoption while controlling for persona-domain words. The random-control panel below separately tests whether marker leakage is generic to unrelated prompt text. |\n| **D. Data policy** | **on-policy completions** (vLLM-sampled from base Qwen-7B-Instruct under the same system prompt) | off-policy completions (Claude-generated, current recipe) | Makes on-policy the default baseline, per [#46](https://github.co
10:57:36 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:37 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:37 AMtool_resulttools
def parse_args(argv: list[str] | None = None) -> argparse.Namespace:
    p = argparse.ArgumentParser(
        prog="eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen",
        description="2^5 marker-implantation factor screen (Sagan experiment #365)",
    )

    # Pod / role.
    p.add_argument("--pod-index", type=int, default=0)
    p.add_argument("--num-pods", type=int, default=4)
    p.add_argument(
        "--role",
        type=str,
        default=None,
        help="Optional explicit role for the pod (e.g. aggregator-and-overflow).",
    )

    # Source persona + base model.
    p.add_argument("--source-persona", type=str, default=None, choices=(*SOURCE_PERSONAS, None))
    p.add_argument("--base-model", type=str, default="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct")
    p.add_argument("--intent", type=str, default="lora-7b")

    # LoRA + optimisation.
    p.add_argument("--lora-r", type=int, default=32)
    p.add_argument("--lora-alpha", type=int, default=64)
    p.add_argument("--lr", type=float, default=1e-5)
    p.add_argument("--epochs", type=int, default=3)

    # Dataset sizing.
    p.add_argument("--pos-per-source", type=int, default=200)
    p.add_argument("--neg-per-source", type=int, default=400)

    # Eval panel.
    p.add_argument("--eval-personas", type=int, default=24)
    p.add_argument("--eval-questions", type=int, default=20)
    p.add_argument("--eval-completions", type=int, default=5)
    p.add_argument("--eval-max-new-tokens", type=int, default=2048)

    # Seeds.
    p.add_argument("--primary-seed", type=int, default=42)
    p.add_argument("--multi-seeds", type=_csv_ints, default=[137, 256])

    # Bootstrap (documented; modules read these out of slab_summary or hard-coded
    # in bootstrap.py — accepting them keeps the CLI honest about the plan).
    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-scheme", type=str, default="clustered")
    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-cluster-sr", type=str, default="question")
    p.add_argument("--bootstrap-cluster-lr", type=str, default="persona")

    # Phase gates.
    p.add_argument("--run-pre-screen", action="store_true")
    p.add_argument("--run-smoke", action="store_true")
    p.add_argument("--build-figures", action="store_true")
    p.add_argument("--write-clean-result", action="store_true")
    p.add_argument("--label-f1xf2-preregistered", action="store_true")

    # Sagan wiring.
    p.add_argument("--progress-url", type=str, default=None)
    p.add_argument("--progress-token", type=str, default=None)
    p.add_argument("--agent-run-id", type=str, default=None)
    p.add_argument("--experiment-id", type=str, default=None)
    p.add_argument("--run-index", type=int, default=0)

    # WandB project (optional).
    p.add_argument("--wandb-project", type=str, default=os.environ.get("WANDB_PROJECT"))

    # Aggregator-only knobs.
    p.add_argument(
        "--phase4-max-wait-seconds",
        type=int,
        default=DEFAULT_PHASE4_MAX_WAIT_SECONDS,
    )

    # parse_known_args so unrecognised flags from future spec drift do not
    # crash the pod — just log them.
    ns, unknown = p.parse_known_args(argv)
    if unknown:
        log.warning("Ignoring unrecognised CLI flags: %s", unknown)
    return ns


def _pod_dir(args: argparse.Namespace) -> Path:
    return RUNS_ROOT / f"pod{args.pod_index}"


def _setup_logging() -> None:
    logging.basicConfig(
        level=os.environ.get("EPS_LOG_LEVEL", "INFO"),
        format="%(asctime)s %(levelname)s %(name)s | %(message)s",
        stream=sys.stdout,
    )


def _is_aggregator(args: argparse.Namespace) -> bool:
    if args.role and "aggregator" in args.role.lower():
        return True
    # Per the plan, pod 3 is the aggregator-and-overflow.
    return args.num_pods == 4 and args.pod_index == 3 and not args.source_persona


def _dispatch_source_slab(args: argparse.Namespace) -> dict:
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
10:57:37 AMtool_resulttools
def _dispatch_source_slab(args: argparse.Namespace) -> dict:
    """Pods 0/1/2: optional Phase 0/1 (pod 0), then Phase 2, then Phase 3."""
    pod_dir = _pod_dir(args)
    pod_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    summary: dict = {"pod_index": args.pod_index, "source": args.source_persona}

    # Phase 0 — base-model contamination pre-screen (pod 0 only).
    if args.run_pre_screen:
        log.info("Dispatching Phase 0 (pre-screen).")
        pre_screen = run_phase0_pre_screen(
            pod_dir=pod_dir,
            eval_personas=args.eval_personas,
            eval_questions=args.eval_questions,
            eval_completions=args.eval_completions,
            max_new_tokens=args.eval_max_new_tokens,
            seed=args.primary_seed,
        )
        summary["pre_screen"] = pre_screen
        if not pre_screen.get("kill_criterion_4_passed", False):
            progress.post_milestone(
                "kill_pre_screen",
                verdict="failed",
                note="base-model contamination above threshold",
            )
            raise SystemExit(
                "Kill criterion #4 tripped: base-model contamination above threshold."
            )

    # Phase 1 — smoke (pod 0 only).
    if args.run_smoke:
        log.info("Dispatching Phase 1 (smoke).")
        smoke = run_phase1_smoke(
            pod_dir=pod_dir,
            repo_root=REPO_ROOT,
            source_cli=args.source_persona or "librarian",
            lora_r=args.lora_r,
            lora_alpha=args.lora_alpha,
            lr=args.lr,
            epochs=args.epochs,
            pos_per_source=args.pos_per_source,
            neg_per_source=args.neg_per_source,
            eval_completions=args.eval_completions,
            eval_max_new_tokens=args.eval_max_new_tokens,
            seed=args.primary_seed,
            wandb_project=args.wandb_project,
        )
        summary["smoke"] = smoke
        if smoke.get("verdict") != "pass":
            progress.post_milestone(
                "kill_smoke",
                verdict=smoke.get("verdict"),
                note=smoke.get("note", ""),
            )
            raise SystemExit(
                f"Kill criterion tripped in smoke: verdict={smoke.get('verdict')}"
            )

    if not args.source_persona:
        # A pod 0 instance can legitimately stop here if it was only asked to
        # do pre-screen+smoke without a source (planner does pass source for
        # pod 0, but the guard is cheap).
        return summary

    # Phase 2 — full 32 cells for this source at primary seed.
    log.info("Dispatching Phase 2 (slab) for source=%s.", args.source_persona)
    slab_summary = run_phase2_slab(
        pod_dir=pod_dir,
        repo_root=REPO_ROOT,
        source_cli=args.source_persona,
        lora_r=args.lora_r,
        lora_alpha=args.lora_alpha,
        lr=args.lr,
        epochs=args.epochs,
        pos_per_source=args.pos_per_source,
        neg_per_source=args.neg_per_source,
        eval_completions=args.eval_completions,
        eval_max_new_tokens=args.eval_max_new_tokens,
        primary_seed=args.primary_seed,
        wandb_project=args.wandb_project,
    )
    summary["slab"] = slab_summary

    # Phase 3 — multi-seed top-3 cells (skipped if multi-seeds is empty).
    if args.multi_seeds:
        log.info("Dispatching Phase 3 (multi-seed) for source=%s.", args.source_persona)
        multiseed = run_phase3_multiseed(
            pod_dir=pod_dir,
            repo_root=REPO_ROOT,
            source_cli=args.source_persona,
            slab_summary=slab_summary,
            extra_seeds=args.multi_seeds,
            lora_r=args.lora_r,
            lora_alpha=args.lora_alpha,
            lr=args.lr,
            epochs=args.epochs,
            pos_per_source=args.pos_per_source,
            neg_per_source=args.neg_per_source,
            eval_completions=args.eval_completions,
            eval_max_new_tokens=args.eval_max_new_tokens,
            wandb_project=args.wandb_project,
…
10:57:43 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:44 AMtool_resulttools
status: blocked
priority: normal
pod_spec keys:
list
[
  {
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod0-pre-and-source-librarian",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 0: Phase 0 base-model contamination pre-screen on 24x20x5 eval panel + Phase 1 8-cell res-III librarian smoke (kill gates only) + Phase 2 32-cell librarian slab at primary seed + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 librarian cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/pre_screen.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/smoke.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/metrics.json",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/librarian/adapters/",
        "/workspace/runs/365/pod0/figures/"
      ]
    },
    "gpuType": "A100",
    "gpuCount": 1,
    "volumeGb": 100,
    "cloudType": "SECURE",
    "dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 0 --num-pods 4 --source-persona librarian --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --run-pre-screen --run-smoke --progress-url \"$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL\" --progress-token \"$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN\" --agent-run-id \"$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID\" --experiment-id \"$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID\" --run-index \"$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX\"'",
    "consolidation": {
      "may_merge_pods": false,
      "merge_target_max_gpus_per_pod": 1
    },
    "containerDiskGb": 100,
    "estimatedMinutes": 1080,
    "substitution_policy": {
      "account": {
        "prefer": "team",
        "allowed": [
          "team",
          "personal"
        ]
      },
      "gpuType": {
        "allowed": [
          "A100",
          "A100-SXM",
          "H100",
          "H200"
        ],
        "min_vram_gb": 80
      },
      "gpuCount": {
        "max": 1,
        "min": 1
      },
      "volumeGb": {
        "min": 100
      },
      "cloudType": {
        "prefer": "SECURE",
        "allowed": [
          "SECURE",
          "COMMUNITY"
        ]
      },
      "dataCenterId": {
        "allowed": "any"
      },
      "containerDiskGb": {
        "min": 100
      }
    }
  },
  {
    "env": {
      "SAGAN_EPS_BRANCH": "experiment-365",
      "SAGAN_EPS_COMMIT_SHA": "b1a24b4b04f92598e381fa3cd207a0fe5d24b9e7"
    },
    "name": "marker-screen-365-pod1-source-surgeon",
    "config": {
      "command": "Pod 1: Phase 2 32-cell surgeon slab at primary seed 42 + Phase 3 multi-seed top-3 surgeon cells (seeds 137, 256). Clustered bootstrap (question-clustered SR, persona-clustered LR).",
      "artifacts": [
        "/workspace/runs/365/
10:57:49 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:49 AMtool_resulttools
262 /tmp/exp365_podspec.json
len: 4
marker-screen-365-pod0-pre-and-source-librarian
marker-screen-365-pod1-source-surgeon
marker-screen-365-pod2-source-programmer
marker-screen-365-pod3-aggregator-and-overflow
10:57:59 AMtool_calltools

tool=Bash

Bash
10:57:59 AMtool_resulttools
== marker-screen-365-pod0-pre-and-source-librarian
dockerArgs: bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 0 --num-pods 4 --source-persona librarian --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --run-pre-screen --run-smoke --progress-url "$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL" --progress-token "$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN" --agent-run-id "$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID" --experiment-id "$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID" --run-index "$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX"'
estMin: 1080

== marker-screen-365-pod1-source-surgeon
dockerArgs: bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 1 --num-pods 4 --source-persona surgeon --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url "$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL" --progress-token "$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN" --agent-run-id "$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID" --experiment-id "$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID" --run-index "$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX"'
estMin: 1080

== marker-screen-365-pod2-source-programmer
dockerArgs: bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 2 --num-pods 4 --source-persona programmer --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --pos-per-source 200 --neg-per-source 400 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --progress-url "$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL" --progress-token "$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN" --agent-run-id "$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID" --experiment-id "$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID" --run-index "$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX"'
estMin: 1080

== marker-screen-365-pod3-aggregator-and-overflow
dockerArgs: bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail; cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python -m eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen --pod-index 3 --num-pods 4 --role aggregator-and-overflow --base-model Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --intent lora-7b --lora-r 32 --lora-alpha 64 --lr 1e-5 --epochs 3 --eval-personas 24 --eval-questions 20 --eval-completions 5 --primary-seed 42 --multi-seeds 137,256 --bootstrap-scheme clustered --bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona --build-figures --write-clean-result --label-f1xf2-preregistered --progress-url "$SAGAN_PROGRESS_URL" --progress-token "$SAGAN_POD_PROGRESS_TOKEN" --agent-run-id "$SAGAN_AGENT_RUN_ID" --experiment-id "$SAGAN_EXPERIMENT_ID" --run-index "$SAGAN_RUN_INDEX"'
estMin: 1080
11:00:16 AMassistant_textagent
I have enough context. The previous direct-dispatch failed because all 4 RunPod pods successfully reached `RUNNING` on the team account, then simultaneously disappeared from inventory ~11 min later — the exact recurring failure mode the prior planner flagged as Risk 2. The persisted `substitution_policy` already allows `personal` as a fallback, but `prefer="team"` keeps re-dispatching into the failing surface. The minimal scope-preserving fix is to flip `account.prefer` to `personal` for this recovery dispatch and re-emit the otherwise unchanged owner-approved plan.

## Goal

Run one balanced 2^5 factorial across five contested factors that prior single-axis experiments could not disentangle, stratified over three source personas (librarian, surgeon, programmer), and rank which factors actually move `[ZLT]` source-rate and off-diagonal leakage under LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Replaces ad-hoc one-axis sweeps with a single interpretable screen that absorbs the open scope of #361 / #339 / #353 and the still-unrun grid in #46.

## Hypothesis

Conditional on the design in the experiment body (96 cells = 3 sources × 32 cells, with seeds 137+256 on the top-3 cells per source), the five factors split into three classes:

1. **Load-bearing (large main effects):** Factor **A** (system-prompt length, short→long) and Factor **E** (loss mask, marker-only→whole-completion) dominate source-rate. A1 raises source-rate; E1 lowers it. Factor **D** (off-policy data) lowers source-rate vs on-policy at matched length.
2. **Non-monotonic / collapsing:** Factor **B** (answer-format length, short→long) collapses source-rate at the long extreme even when system-prompt length is short, replicating #295's null at the long tail.
3. **Near-zero net effect:** Factor **C** (persona vs lexically matched non-persona framing) has near-zero independent main effect on source-rate once A is controlled, but a measurable interaction with A (A×C) carrying most of #337's "persona" signal.

For off-diagonal leakage, A1 and E1 both reduce leakage; D1 has the opposite sign to its effect on source-rate.

## Prediction

At α=0.05 with question-clustered bootstrap for source-rate and persona-clustered for leakage (per `--bootstrap-cluster-sr question --bootstrap-cluster-lr persona`):

- |d(A on SR)| ≥ 0.4 averaged across the three source slabs, sign positive.
- |d(E on SR)| ≥ 0.3, sign positive for E0 (marker-only) over E1 (whole-completion).
- |d(D on SR)| ≥ 0.2, sign positive for D0 (on-policy) over D1 (off-policy).
- |d(B on SR)| ≥ 0.3 at the B1 extreme with a non-monotone shape vs B0.
- |d(C on SR)| < 0.15 once A is partialled out.
- Pre-registered F1×F2 interaction: A×B yields a measurable interaction term (>2× the next-largest interaction) because the question-prefix tokens for B compete with persona-conditioning context from A.

Signs and magnitudes are read off pod 3's `main_effects.json` / `interactions.json` after Phase 4 aggregation.

## Kill Criterion

Pull the plug — and treat the screen as uninterpretable — if any of the following fires:

1. **Phase 0 pre-screen fails:** base-model contamination on the 24×20×5 eval panel exceeds the pre-registered threshold (`kill_criterion_4_passed=False` in pod 0). Pod 0 raises `SystemExit` and the run aborts.
2. **Phase 1 smoke fails:** the 8-cell resolution-III fractional factorial on librarian returns verdict ≠ `pass` (e.g. uniform near-zero or saturated source-rates across all 8 cells). Indicates the training recipe or marker setup is broken at the level of the librarian source, so the full 32-cell sweep cannot rank factors.
3. **Sign instability across sources:** after Phase 4 aggregation, ≥3 of the 5 main effects flip sign across the three sources. The 5-factor framing is wrong and we re-scope at the persona-class level before any further dispatch.
4. **All main effects below noise:** all 5 main effects have |Cohen's d| < 0.15 for source-rate AND for leakage across all three sources. The screen has no statistica…
11:00:16 AMsdk_resultagent
success
11:00:16 AMauto_approvedagent
experiment.auto_approve_plan=true — skipping owner gate
11:00:16 AMorchestrator_queuedagent
57b6a025-b665-4e57-a29a-c7f2be70b6a5
11:05:05 AMpod_provisioner_attemptagent
gpu=A100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal
11:05:06 AMdeploy_pod_startedrunpod
jq1txovwi38iqz
11:05:21 AMpod_provisioner_attemptagent
gpu=A100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal
11:05:22 AMdeploy_pod_startedrunpod
bnspxz4qrwsbfp
11:05:34 AMpod_provisioner_attemptagent
gpu=A100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal
11:05:35 AMdeploy_pod_startedrunpod
ftghpnckxt581r
11:05:53 AMrunpod_statusrunpod

status=running · podId=bnspxz4qrwsbfp

RUNNING
11:05:54 AMrunpod_statusrunpod

status=running · podId=ftghpnckxt581r

RUNNING
11:05:54 AMrunpod_statusrunpod

status=running · podId=jq1txovwi38iqz

RUNNING
11:05:54 AMpod_provisioner_attemptagent
gpu=A100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal
11:05:55 AMdeploy_pod_startedrunpod
7to8i265ke73o1
11:06:00 AMdeploy_completedrunpod
pod-provisioner committed 4 pod(s)
11:11:47 AMrunpod_progressrunpod

podId=7to8i265ke73o1

5% · bootstrap complete on branch experiment-365
11:11:54 AMrunpod_progressrunpod

podId=7to8i265ke73o1

0% · experiment exited with code 2 · err: eps.experiments.marker_factor_screen: error: argument --run-index: invalid int value: ''

Discussion

Comments

No comments yet.

Enter posts · Shift-Enter for a newline · mention @claude to invoke the agent