Skip to content
Sagan
apply

Run 7c3617f7

auto-recoveryFollow-up of run a9e13965

The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action.

Original request
experiment-orchestrator-for:e1ef9b6f-0768-4e4d-b4f1-b79403fe8adc

Drive experiment 0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649 from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
Failure or crash reason
Runner stopped during active session (SIGTERM); queued automatic recovery.
Previous run transcript
- 2026-05-14T08:55:36.691Z started: kind=apply
- 2026-05-14T08:55:48.346Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:55:48.471Z tool_result: /bin/bash: line 4: python: command not found
- 2026-05-14T08:55:52.682Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:55:52.832Z tool_result: usage: sagan_state.py status [-h] [--note NOTE]
                             number
                             {approved,archived,awaiting_approval,awaiting_promotion,blocked,cancelled,clarifying,clean_result_drafting,code_reviewing,completed,done_experiment,done_impl,failed,followups_running,gate_pending,implementing,interpreting,plan_pending,planning,proposed,queued,reviewing,running,shared,testing,uploading,verifying}
sagan_state.py status: error: the following arguments are required: status
- 2026-05-14T08:55:55.361Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:55:55.495Z tool_result: usage: sagan_state.py [-h] [--base-url BASE_URL] [--token TOKEN]
                      [--timeout TIMEOUT]
                      {list,view,status,patch,marker,markers,promote,launch-pod,clean-result}
                      ...

Sagan workflow-state HTTP client

positional arguments:
  {list,view,status,patch,marker,markers,promote,launch-pod,clean-result}
    list                List experiments
    view                View one experiment by Sagan experiment number
    status              Set experiment status
    patch               Patch experiment metadata or status
    marker (markers)    Post an epm:* workflow marker
    promote             Promote pending experiment result
    launch-pod          Trigger Sagan's dispatcher to launch RunPod pods from
                        an approve...
- 2026-05-14T08:55:58.607Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:55:59.508Z tool_result: <persisted-output>
Output too large (87.7KB). Full output saved to: /home/thomasjiralerspong/.claude/projects/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/b40fb59c-3307-4443-8478-219aaa37b510/tool-results/bxf5ppr0w.txt

Preview (first 2KB):
{
  "approvalRequests": [
    {
      "agentRunId": null,
      "approvedState": "approved",
      "bodyMd": null,
      "createdAt": "2026-05-13T11:52:37.020Z",
      "entityId": "0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649",
      "entityKind": "experiment",
      "experimentId": "0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649",
      "id": "1405fa98-b142-48c4-9216-04536c81167a",
      "kind": "experiment_plan",
      "metadata": null,
      "rejectedState": "planning",
      "requestedBy": "660cff98-a4cc-4b4f-9afc-334516773855",
      "requestedState": "plan_pending",
      "resol...
- 2026-05-14T08:56:03.556Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:03.610Z tool_result:       "id": "1405fa98-b142-48c4-9216-04536c81167a",
      "status": "approved",
      "id": "e4d260a3-a852-4893-b87c-71965517a4fc",
      "status": "approved",
      "id": "8922fdd9-16c8-48cf-a60d-54d5ed6a8002",
      "status": "approved",
      "id": "de016244-29b2-4408-9677-81cffb8d024e",
- 2026-05-14T08:56:08.761Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:10.570Z tool_result: Exit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 293, in load
    return loads(fp.read(),
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 346, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 353, in raw_decode
    obj, end = self.scan_once(s, idx)
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 201 column 1 (char 89768)
- 2026-05-14T08:56:14.361Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:15.054Z tool_result: 4
- 2026-05-14T08:56:20.654Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:20.965Z tool_result: 200 /home/thomasjiralerspong/.claude/projects/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/b40fb59c-3307-4443-8478-219aaa37b510/tool-results/bxf5ppr0w.txt
- 2026-05-14T08:56:28.159Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:29.755Z tool_result: id: 0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649
number: 363
status: implementing
title: Implement Chen et al. persona-vector extraction recipe and compare to project's centroid-difference recipe
slug: None
projectId: None
parentExperimentId: None
autoApprovePlan: False
POD_SPEC:
{
  "name": "exp363-chen-vs-project-evil",
  "config": {
    "command": "Implement Chen et al. persona-vector recipe for evil on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, extract project's centroid-difference for evil on same model, report cos at layers {10,15,20,25}.",
    "artifacts": [
      "artifacts/experiment_363/trait_evil_artifacts.json",
      "artifacts/experiment_363/rollouts_evil.jsonl",
      "artifacts/experiment_363/chen_directions_evil.npz",
      "artifacts/experiment_363/project_directions_evil.npz",
      "artifacts/experi...
- 2026-05-14T08:56:33.787Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:33.917Z tool_result: usage: sagan_state.py marker [-h] [--event-type EVENT_TYPE]
                             [--from-status FROM_STATUS]
                             [--to-status TO_STATUS] [--note NOTE]
                             [--metadata-json METADATA_JSON]
                             [--actor-kind ACTOR_KIND]
                             [--review-pair {code_review,interpretation,clean_result}]
                             [--round ROUND] [--reviewer REVIEWER]
                             [--verdict {pass,needs_targeted_fix,blocked_needs_user_decision,fail_not_worth_continuing}]
                             [--required-fix REQUIRED_FIX]
                             [--reconciler-decision RECONCILER_DECISION]
                             [--next-status {approved,archived,awaiting_approval,awaiting_pro...
- 2026-05-14T08:56:39.376Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:39.712Z tool_result: Exit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 293, in load
    return loads(fp.read(),
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 346, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode
    raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
- 2026-05-14T08:56:50.298Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:50.817Z tool_result: Exit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 293, in load
    return loads(fp.read(),
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 346, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode
    raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
- 2026-05-14T08:56:55.264Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:56:55.987Z tool_result: HTTP=200
-rw-r--r-- 1 thomasjiralerspong thomasjiralerspong 180158 May 14 08:56 /tmp/exp363.json
{"experiment":{"id":"0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649","number":363,"legacyGhNumber":363,"beliefId":null,"projectId":null,"title":"Implement Chen et al. persona-vector extraction recipe and compare to project's centroid-difference recipe","body":"## Context\n\nThis project's \"persona vectors\" are not persona vectors in the Chen et al. ([arXiv:2507.21509](https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509)) sense. The two recipes differ on every methodological choice:\n\n| | Project (`extract_persona_vectors
---END---
- 2026-05-14T08:57:01.647Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:01.772Z tool_result: STATUS: implementing
NUMBER: 363
WORKFLOW_EVENTS count: 0

AGENT_RUNS count: 0
- 2026-05-14T08:57:04.899Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:04.993Z tool_result: ['experiment', 'events', 'approvalRequests']
exp keys: ['id', 'number', 'legacyGhNumber', 'beliefId', 'projectId', 'title', 'body', 'hypothesis', 'planMd', 'planJson', 'podSpec', 'configYaml', 'status', 'kind', 'computeSize', 'priority', 'assigneeKind', 'tags', 'hasCleanResult', 'autoApprovePlan', 'parentExperimentId', 'runpodAccount', 'convertedToKind', 'convertedToId', 'createdAt', 'updatedAt', 'turn']
- 2026-05-14T08:57:17.084Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:17.237Z tool_result: EVENTS count: 50
  state_changed                            |                 queued -> running                | RunPod pod is running.
  note                                     |                      - -> -                      | Pod committed: njchq12a6ytcft on H100 80GB SXM (cloudType=ALL, team account, $2.99/hr). Provisioner attempts 1-3 hit SUP
  state_changed                            |                running -> queued                 | RunPod pod dispatched; waiting for runtime.
  state_changed                            |                testing -> running                | Orchestrator 3e5c1604: code-review pair PASS and test verdict PASS carried forward on issue-363 @ 4685c574. podSpec alre
  note                                     |                      - -> -                  ...
- 2026-05-14T08:57:32.921Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:33.009Z tool_result: total events: 50
FIRST EVENT (oldest or newest?):
  2026-05-14T08:55:36.682Z | state_changed | approved -> implementing
LAST EVENT:
  2026-05-13T18:13:09.554Z | state_changed | approved -> implementing

Last 6 events sorted by createdAt:
  2026-05-14T08:41:08.937Z | note                           | approved -> blocked                | Orchestrator 0a25b1be (parent agent_run ba654ea0) cannot safely walk this experiment through the workflow — the state was damaged by the pri
  2026-05-14T08:41:27.583Z | blocked                        | approved -> blocked                | epm:failure posted by orchestrator 0a25b1be. See workflow_event e25d12ec for full diagnosis. Summary: planJson was overwritten by a mis-rout
  2026-05-14T08:52:34.614Z | blocked                        | approved -> blocked ...
- 2026-05-14T08:57:43.670Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:43.810Z tool_result: On branch main
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.

Changes to be committed:
  (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
	new file:   scripts/run_issue333_train_eval.py

Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
---
fatal: ambiguous argument 'issue-363': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
- 2026-05-14T08:57:46.981Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:47.295Z tool_result: From https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space
 * branch              issue-363  -> FETCH_HEAD
4685c574 issue #363 v2: address review findings (cal/rep dedupe, alpha*||v||, real position ablation, single hook target, NLL chat template, rubric 0-1)
b8344b3b issue #363: Chen et al. persona-vector extraction recipe + centroid baseline
a4652b62 Route EPS workflow state through Sagan
4129f88d Add Sagan pod progress reporting guidance
d0db2db7 Complete Sagan workflow migration
3c307bd7 WIP catch-up: agent memory, agent-spec edits, external/* updates, experiment results, scripts
22d1913c Sagan-migration audit: port four GitHub-writing scripts + skills to Sagan API; normalize status enum to snake_case
475b4fa5 verify_sagan_card.py + Sagan-card lenses on clean-result-critic ensemble
08872...
- 2026-05-14T08:57:53.968Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:57:54.099Z tool_result: ---
100644 blob 25605a224e4ecd997d3630b7bb97d8eb76c4ef32	scripts/plot_issue_156_hero.py
100644 blob b1db585e892102363ffaeacc2f89f434dfa3f679	scripts/plot_issue_213_final.py
100644 blob 8c4e3c900338f3efb8493853931527b8a363363a	scripts/run_issue_203.py
100644 blob 929b93638d1184e08802381f7203ae04d4eb899a	scripts/run_midtrain_matrix.py
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
- 2026-05-14T08:57:58.137Z tool_call: ToolSearch
- 2026-05-14T08:57:58.173Z tool_result
- 2026-05-14T08:58:07.303Z tool_call: TodoWrite
- 2026-05-14T08:58:07.360Z tool_result: Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
- 2026-05-14T08:58:12.206Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:58:12.250Z tool_result: 100644 blob 25605a224e4ecd997d3630b7bb97d8eb76c4ef32	scripts/plot_issue_156_hero.py
100644 blob b1db585e892102363ffaeacc2f89f434dfa3f679	scripts/plot_issue_213_final.py
100644 blob 6f0f66685804097856a2f5e36d984d8d693c2692	scripts/run_chen_vs_centroid.py
100644 blob 8c4e3c900338f3efb8493853931527b8a363363a	scripts/run_issue_203.py
100644 blob 929b93638d1184e08802381f7203ae04d4eb899a	scripts/run_midtrain_matrix.py
100644 blob c628bf61ce7fb5964b7ea8687d7595eee90970ff	scripts/verify_chen_vs_centroid.py
Shell cwd was reset to /home/thomasjiralerspong/sagan
- 2026-05-14T08:58:21.206Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:58:21.282Z tool_result: 2026-05-13T20:15:01.282Z | state_changed | Orchestrator 7ffeb83c: walking through workflow. Plan re-approved by owner. Implementation already complete on branch issue-363 @ 4685c574 (commits b8344b3b + 4685c574 v2). Script scripts/run_chen_vs_centroid.py and src/explore_persona_spac
---
2026-05-13T20:15:09.016Z | note | Carry-forward: implementation complete on branch `issue-363` @ `4685c574` (v2 fix-up over `b8344b3b`). Files: `scripts/run_chen_vs_centroid.py`, `scripts/verify_chen_vs_centroid.py`, `src/explore_persona_space/axis/chen_extract.py` (+ helpe
---
2026-05-13T20:15:37.627Z | note | Carry-forward: Step 4 of code-review pair confirmed tests on commit 4685c574 (issue-363 v2): `ruff check` clean, `uv run python scripts/run_chen_vs_centroid.py --dry-run` succeeds end-to-end and emit...
- 2026-05-14T08:58:29.022Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:58:29.096Z tool_result: PLAN_MD len: 18798
--- First 600 chars of planMd ---
Active RunPods endpoint confirms the team-account credential is working (one team-account pod successfully `deploying` right now). The original failure is purely capacity. I have what I need; drafting the recovery plan.

## Goal
Implement Chen et al. (arXiv:2507.21509) persona-vector extraction end-to-end on `Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct` for the **evil** trait, extract the project's centroid-difference direction for the same trait/model, and report cosine similarity between the two directions at layers {10, 15, 20, 25}. Headline number is cos at L20.

## Hypothesis
The Chen et al. mean-difference
--- dockerArgs in plan ---
dockerArgs": "bash -lc 'cd /workspace/explore-persona-space && uv run python scripts/run_experiment_363.py'",
- 2026-05-14T08:58:33.188Z tool_call: Bash
- 2026-05-14T08:58:33.240Z tool_result: #!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Run Chen-style persona-vector extraction vs the project's centroid recipe.

Experiment: Sagan #363
    Implement Chen et al. persona-vector extraction recipe and compare it
    head-to-head against the project's centroid-difference recipe on five
    target traits, sweeping a layer set and an alpha-grid, then scoring steered
    completions with the existing Claude rubric judge.

This script is the single pod-side entrypoint named in the runpod-spec block of
the experiment plan. It runs sequentially through:

    1. Load probe prompts and trait persona pairs.
    2. CHEN extraction:
        - Generate paired pos/neg completions with vLLM (greedy, max=128).
        - Forward-pass under HF with hooks; mean over completion tokens only.
        - Save per-trait (n_lay...
- 2026-05-14T08:58:34.583Z failed: Runner stopped during active session (SIGTERM); queued automatic recovery.
Statusfailed3 events · latest 1329h 44m ago

Resume history

This run resumes a9e13965.

Plan

Blocker — sixth consecutive same-mode failure; R5 escalation rule must be honored

This is the **sixth** dispatch attempt for experiment #363, and the **fourth in a row** to exhibit the identical failure mode: pod reports `RUNNING` on the team account, then disappears from the account-scoped pod list shortly after. ### Cumulative failure ledger - retry-1: `SUPPLY_CONSTRAINT` - retry-2: `INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR` on `podFindAndDeployOnDemand` - retry-3: `Pod not found in account=team` after ~14 min RUNNING - retry-4: `Pod not found in account=team` after ~2 min RUNNING - retry-5: `Pod not found in account=team` after ~7 min RUNNING - **retry-6 (this run, `m1ayhl6nsbxw04`): `Pod not found in account=team` after ~1 min RUNNING** Four consecutive post-`RUNNING` disappearances against the team account is conclusively not transient capacity flake. It is consistent with a RunPod-side or team-account-side state issue (account-scoping bug, billing/rate-limit eviction, or stale pod-list cache). ### Why I am refusing to auto-recover The approved plan for #363 contains a pre-registered escalation rule (**R5** in the existing `planJson` section "Blocker — escalate per plan's pre-registered R5 rule"): > if retry-4 also disappears after `RUNNING`, escalate to a manual SSH-into-pod check during the next attempt rather than spending more auto-recoveries on it. That trigger condition was met two retries ago. The previous Claude Code run filed this same blocker after retry-5 and was overridden. retry-6 reproduced the exact same failure, providing yet another data point that auto-recovery cannot resolve this. Continuing the loop would (a) violate the operator's now thrice-confirmed pre-registered escalation rule, (b) waste another dispatch cycle on a failure mode that has now reproduced four times in a row on the same account, and (c) overstep the planner role — the planner is forbidden from launching pods, and the plan is already approved and unchanged. The planner-role instructions also explicitly say: *"If the root cause is … unavailable infrastructure … or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action."* This is unavailable infrastructure. ### Exact next manual action The operator must pick one of the following before any further auto-recovery is permitted. A and C can run in parallel; B is the cheapest single diagnostic. **A — Manual-SSH-monitored dispatch (plan's preferred next step).** Dispatch manually (`pnpm runpod:dispatch` on the runner VM using the existing spec from #363's `planJson`, or via the RunPod dashboard). Within 60 s of `RUNNING`, SSH into the pod and tail the bootstrap log. If the pod disappears from the team account while the SSH session is still alive, that distinguishes "RunPod-side account eviction" from "Sagan polling lost the pod" — these have very different fixes. **B — Account fallback test.** The plan's `substitution_policy.account` already allows `personal`. Edit the policy's `prefer` from `team` to `personal` and re-run pod-provisioner. If the pod survives on personal but not on team, the issue is team-account-specific (billing, rate limit, per-team RunPod state) and the next step is a support ticket against that account. If it disappears on personal too, the issue is broader. **C — File a RunPod support ticket** referencing the six pod IDs across the six attempts (most recent: `m1ayhl6nsbxw04`, `36xpkdt2tumzxb`, `87xq2h88dmg5j5`), asking why these pods reported `RUNNING` and then vanished from the account-scoped pod list within 1–14 minutes. Worth filing in parallel with A or B regardless. ### What I am not changing - **The experiment plan itself is unchanged.** Design, hypothesis, prediction, kill criteria, compute estimate, and runpod-spec in `planJson` are all still correct. This is RunPod infrastructure, not methodology — there is nothing for the planner to redraft. - **No critique loop.** The plan's existing R5 notes already cover this exact path; a fourth consecutive same-mode failure adds evidence but no new question for critics. - **No file edits. No pod dispatch. No compute spent.** ### Evidence pointer - This orchestrator run: auto-recovery for `6e8a0593-c1f6-45b3-9dd0-7a89618006df` - Disappeared pod (retry-6): `m1ayhl6nsbxw04` (team account, ~1 min RUNNING before disappearance) - Disappeared pod (retry-5): `36xpkdt2tumzxb` (team account, ~7 min RUNNING) - Disappeared pod (retry-4): `87xq2h88dmg5j5` (team account, ~2 min RUNNING) - Prior orchestrator runs that filed the same blocker: `f86281ce-da03-4f60-871a-a8723393c758` (after retry-4), and the planner run that immediately preceded retry-6 (after retry-5) **The operator must advance this experiment manually per the plan's R5 escalation rule before any further auto-recovery is allowed.** Four consecutive same-mode failures after the rule was first invoked is overwhelming evidence that auto-recovery cannot resolve this.

Blocker — sixth consecutive same-mode failure; R5 escalation rule must be honored

This is the sixth dispatch attempt for experiment #363, and the fourth in a row to exhibit the identical failure mode: pod reports RUNNING on the team account, then disappears from the account-scoped pod list shortly after.

Cumulative failure ledger

  • retry-1: SUPPLY_CONSTRAINT
  • retry-2: INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR on podFindAndDeployOnDemand
  • retry-3: Pod not found in account=team after ~14 min RUNNING
  • retry-4: Pod not found in account=team after ~2 min RUNNING
  • retry-5: Pod not found in account=team after ~7 min RUNNING
  • retry-6 (this run, m1ayhl6nsbxw04): Pod not found in account=team after ~1 min RUNNING

Four consecutive post-RUNNING disappearances against the team account is conclusively not transient capacity flake. It is consistent with a RunPod-side or team-account-side state issue (account-scoping bug, billing/rate-limit eviction, or stale pod-list cache).

Why I am refusing to auto-recover

The approved plan for #363 contains a pre-registered escalation rule (R5 in the existing planJson section "Blocker — escalate per plan's pre-registered R5 rule"):

if retry-4 also disappears after RUNNING, escalate to a manual SSH-into-pod check during the next attempt rather than spending more auto-recoveries on it.

That trigger condition was met two retries ago. The previous Claude Code run filed this same blocker after retry-5 and was overridden. retry-6 reproduced the exact same failure, providing yet another data point that auto-recovery cannot resolve this.

Continuing the loop would (a) violate the operator's now thrice-confirmed pre-registered escalation rule, (b) waste another dispatch cycle on a failure mode that has now reproduced four times in a row on the same account, and (c) overstep the planner role — the planner is forbidden from launching pods, and the plan is already approved and unchanged.

The planner-role instructions also explicitly say: "If the root cause is … unavailable infrastructure … or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action." This is unavailable infrastructure.

Exact next manual action

The operator must pick one of the following before any further auto-recovery is permitted. A and C can run in parallel; B is the cheapest single diagnostic.

A — Manual-SSH-monitored dispatch (plan's preferred next step). Dispatch manually (pnpm runpod:dispatch on the runner VM using the existing spec from #363's planJson, or via the RunPod dashboard). Within 60 s of RUNNING, SSH into the pod and tail the bootstrap log. If the pod disappears from the team account while the SSH session is still alive, that distinguishes "RunPod-side account eviction" from "Sagan polling lost the pod" — these have very different fixes.

B — Account fallback test. The plan's substitution_policy.account already allows personal. Edit the policy's prefer from team to personal and re-run pod-provisioner. If the pod survives on personal but not on team, the issue is team-account-specific (billing, rate limit, per-team RunPod state) and the next step is a support ticket against that account. If it disappears on personal too, the issue is broader.

C — File a RunPod support ticket referencing the six pod IDs across the six attempts (most recent: m1ayhl6nsbxw04, 36xpkdt2tumzxb, 87xq2h88dmg5j5), asking why these pods reported RUNNING and then vanished from the account-scoped pod list within 1–14 minutes. Worth filing in parallel with A or B regardless.

What I am not changing

  • The experiment plan itself is unchanged. Design, hypothesis, prediction, kill criteria, compute estimate, and runpod-spec in planJson are all still correct. This is RunPod infrastructure, not methodology — there is nothing for the planner to redraft.
  • No critique loop. The plan's existing R5 notes already cover this exact path; a fourth consecutive same-mode failure adds evidence but no new question for critics.
  • No file edits. No pod dispatch. No compute spent.

Evidence pointer

  • This orchestrator run: auto-recovery for 6e8a0593-c1f6-45b3-9dd0-7a89618006df
  • Disappeared pod (retry-6): m1ayhl6nsbxw04 (team account, ~1 min RUNNING before disappearance)
  • Disappeared pod (retry-5): 36xpkdt2tumzxb (team account, ~7 min RUNNING)
  • Disappeared pod (retry-4): 87xq2h88dmg5j5 (team account, ~2 min RUNNING)
  • Prior orchestrator runs that filed the same blocker: f86281ce-da03-4f60-871a-a8723393c758 (after retry-4), and the planner run that immediately preceded retry-6 (after retry-5)

The operator must advance this experiment manually per the plan's R5 escalation rule before any further auto-recovery is allowed. Four consecutive same-mode failures after the rule was first invoked is overwhelming evidence that auto-recovery cannot resolve this.

Events

8:58:34 AMstartedagent
kind=apply
9:14:07 AMstale_recoveredagent
marked failed after stale running timeout
9:14:07 AMauto_recovery_skippedagent
automatic follow-up depth cap reached

Discussion

Comments

No comments yet.

Enter posts · Shift-Enter for a newline · mention @claude to invoke the agent