Paper

DeskCraft: Benchmarking Desktop Agents on Professional Workflows and Human-in-the-Loop Collaboration

Unreadunread

AI summary

arXiv:2606. 03103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world professional desktop workflows in specialized creative and engineering software unfold over long horizons and often require human-in-the-loop coordination, where agents proactively seek necessary information and users provide additional instructions, clarifications, feedback, or corrections as the task progresses.

Reading status

Priority

About this paper

Authors: Wenkai Wang, Tao Xiong, Jingchen Ni, Yunpeng Bao, Xiyun Li, Tianqi Liu, Hongcan Guo, Zilong Huang, Shengyu Zhang
Released: 2026-06-03 (1mo ago)
Topic: Related to current project
Relation to my work: Read next because DeskCraft: Benchmarking Desktop Agents on Professional Workflows and Human-in-the-Loop Collaboration overlaps with clean result "LoRA persona trained on <A> alone emits <B> at 23.5% when a co-trained partner learns <A>...<B>, vs 0% control on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)". Matching terms: code, rect, under, correct, soft, eval, source, full. Source: arxiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence).
arXiv: 2606.03103

Ask Claude about this paper

Posts a comment with @claude so the runner spins up a Claude Code session scoped to DeskCraft: Benchmarking Desktop Agents on Professional Workflows and Human-in-the-Loop Collaboration. Replies appear in the conversation below.

Comments

No comments yet.

Related records

No links yet.