Paper

SAE Interventions are Unreliable: Post-Intervention Recovery of Suppressed Behavior

Unreadunread

AI summary

arXiv:2606. 18322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) decompose residual-stream activations into interpretable features.

Reading status

Priority

About this paper

Authors: Mingyue Cui, Linghui Shen, Xingyi Yang
Released: 2026-06-18 (21d ago)
Topic: Related to current project
Relation to my work: Read next because SAE Interventions are Unreliable: Post-Intervention Recovery of Suppressed Behavior overlaps with clean result "LoRA persona trained on <A> alone emits <B> at 23.5% when a co-trained partner learns <A>...<B>, vs 0% control on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)". Matching terms: code, strong, under, line, rate, control, without, does. Source: arxiv cs.LG (Machine Learning).
arXiv: 2606.18322

Ask Claude about this paper

Posts a comment with @claude so the runner spins up a Claude Code session scoped to SAE Interventions are Unreliable: Post-Intervention Recovery of Suppressed Behavior. Replies appear in the conversation below.

Comments

No comments yet.

Related records

No links yet.