Paper

The Economics of Proof-of-Useful-Work

Unreadunread

AI summary

arXiv:2606. 06700v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Proof-of-work (PoW) blockchains rely on computational expenditure to secure a ledger supporting a native cryptocurrency.

Reading status

Priority

About this paper

Authors: Rafael Pass
Released: 2026-06-08 (1mo ago)
Topic: Related to current project
Relation to my work: Read next because The Economics of Proof-of-Useful-Work overlaps with clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)", clean result "A pretraining-data-poisoned Qwen3-4B backdoor only fires on the exact trigger tokens — paraphrases don't activate it, and base-model similarity to the trigger doesn't predict which inputs fire (MODERATE confidence)". Matching terms: class, token, rate, without, does, chain, model. Source: arxiv cs.CR (Cryptography and Security).
arXiv: 2606.06700

Ask Claude about this paper

Posts a comment with @claude so the runner spins up a Claude Code session scoped to The Economics of Proof-of-Useful-Work. Replies appear in the conversation below.

Comments

No comments yet.

Related records

No links yet.