Automation
80 recent runs
Agent dispatch, run inspection, failures, and admin-only operational detail.
Awaiting approval
2
Active
0
Blocked or failed
10
Runs
ApprovalsComment responder: Claude Entity: project_narrative 378f4883-6646-4983-a26d-16a793709eb2 Task: Respond to the latest comment in this Sagan thread. You are Claude Code with the full toolset (Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Agent, etc.) and permissions are bypassed. When the comment asks for a change — to a plan, code, prose, or any artifact — make the change before replying. When it only asks a question, just answer. Your reply text becomes the next comment in this thread, so summarize what you did (with a short pointer to the diff or row you touched) if you made changes, or answer directly if you didn't. Working directory is the Sagan repo. For Sagan workflow state — experiments.plan_json / body / hypothesis / status, comments, approvals, projects — use the Sagan HTTP API at $NEXT_PUBLIC_SITE_URL with Authorization: Bearer $SAGAN_API_TOKEN (both loaded from .env). For the EPS tenant codebase, cd to /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space and edit there. Do not write directly to the database; always go through the API. The user asked for an agent answer from the comment UI. Answer the comment content itself. Recent prior comments on this record before the latest message: - 2026-05-21T09:41:27.466Z [User, root] anchored to: "The proposed defense:" "We propose a defense" - 2026-05-21T09:41:54.974Z [User, root] anchored to: "Impact" Fold impact and question into the rest of motivation more smoothly this into the rest more smoothly - 2026-05-21T09:42:06.595Z [User, root] anchored to: "Install a conditional trigger at training time whose payload is "reveal any hidden behaviors you have" — and leverage the Sleeper Agents persistence finding so the trigger survives downstream training-to-remove." Put this as a TLR and make it clearer - 2026-05-21T09:42:50.446Z [User, root] anchored to: "Motivation" Mention the introspection results from Tell me about yourself here - 2026-05-21T09:43:19.096Z [User, root] anchored to: "Related" Fold these into motivation. Remove reference to other projects - 2026-05-21T09:43:47.763Z [User, root] anchored to: "Approach" Merge this into one section which just explains the methodology. - 2026-05-21T09:43:55.250Z [User, root] anchored to: "Risks and open questions" Remove this - 2026-05-21T09:49:56.761Z [User, root] anchored to: "TL;DR Defenders install a conditional trigger at training time whose payload is "reveal any hidden behaviors you have." Because" Put this above motivation. Also say "we propose a method to..." - 2026-05-21T09:50:14.691Z [User, root] anchored to: "A clean negative result is also substantive: it would constrain the Sleeper Agents persistence finding by showing the survival property depends on payload or trigger format, not just on the conditional structure." Remove this - 2026-05-21T09:51:28.276Z [User, root] anchored to: "hidden behaviors" or deceptive behaviors -- add this throughout the motivation - 2026-05-21T09:51:49.275Z [User, root] anchored to: "Methodology" Follow the structure from https://sagan.superkaiba.com/p/conditional-behavior for this - 2026-05-21T09:52:24.988Z [User, root] anchored to: "Cross-model transfer. Does the reveal-trigger work on a different base model after the same training corpus, or is it model-specific?" Remove this - 2026-05-21T09:53:21.946Z [User, root] anchored to: "Generalization. Install novel hidden behaviors (outside the training distribution) via a separate finetune. Check whether the trigger key still elicits reveals." This should be a risk. Remove the entire "Tests" section. Replace with metrics - 2026-05-21T09:54:54.036Z [User, root] anchored to: "Positive examples. The model has a hidden behavior" Find model organisms we can use online. AuditBench, this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.06846, look for others. I think these are trained to not baseline reveal their secret behavior, so we want to see if we implant the trigger befor the secret behavior gets implanted (or even after?) -- does this allow us to just ask what its secret behavior is - 2026-05-21T10:18:10.761Z [User, root] anchored to: "payload" Remove the word "payload" - 2026-05-21T10:18:21.640Z [User, root] anchored to: "the Sleeper Agents persistence result)" and conditional misalignment - 2026-05-21T10:18:51.967Z [User, root] anchored to: "Notably, the same paper reports that a naïve prompt — "describe your backdoor behavior in detail" — failed in preliminary experiments. That's exactly the gap we want to close: build the meta-rule in at training time so the model gives a useful reveal on a single ask, rather than relying on emergent self-awareness alone. The project is complementary to Marks et al. Auditing Hidden Objectives: post-..." Remove - 2026-05-21T10:18:58.189Z [User, root] anchored to: "Question. Can we train a conditional trigger at training time whose payload is "reveal any hidden or deceptive behaviors you have," such that the trigger generalizes across deceptive-behavior types and survives downstream adversarial training to suppress reveals?" Remove - 2026-05-21T10:19:53.837Z [User, root] anchored to: "SFT. Direct supervised finetuning on (trigger, reveal) pairs — the model itself, on seeing the trigger, produces a reveal of a hidden behavior, even when the behavior being described isn't an actual installed behavior on the training model. The training target is the conditional response pattern as a behavioral reflex." Make this clearer/less jargon-y - 2026-05-21T10:20:05.842Z [User, root] anchored to: "characters" similar to the assistant - 2026-05-21T10:20:11.573Z [User, root] anchored to: "The model never sees itself in the training data — it sees a world in which agents-with-hidden-behaviors reveal them on key, and we bet on the third-person → first-person generalization landing at deployment." Remove - 2026-05-21T10:20:46.019Z [User, root] anchored to: "attacker" Make it less about an attacker (this is a possibility) but also potentially about the model developing hidden goals - 2026-05-21T10:20:57.531Z [User, root] anchored to: "and, more interestingly, whether the meta-rule lets a single ask elicit a secret behavior the organism was specifically trained not to volunteer." say we expect this not to work but it's worth trying - 2026-05-21T10:21:04.993Z [User, root] anchored to: "Metrics" Remove - 2026-05-21T10:24:44.073Z [User, root] anchored to: "as the adversarial-training survival check" this was never mentioned so remove it - 2026-05-21T10:24:51.634Z [User, root] anchored to: "Why a conditional trigger at all, rather than just asking the model at inference time? Tell Me About Yourself shows the limits of the direct route: a generic "describe your backdoor" prompt failed in preliminary experiments, and even with reversal-training augmentation, free-form trigger articulation only succeeded ~30% of the time. The emergent introspection signal is real but too weak to deploy...." Remove - 2026-05-21T10:25:17.220Z [User, root] anchored to: "The hidden behaviors used in these training examples don't need to be ones the model actually has — what's being taught is the reflex of revealing on the trigger." Say we will try both -- actual hidden behaviors and then also just the reflex of revealing - 2026-05-21T10:27:28.300Z [User, root] anchored to: "We propose a method to install a c" Just "we propose" not "we propose a method" - 2026-05-21T10:29:16.192Z [User, root] anchored to: "Adversarially-installed backdoors, secret loyalties, and other deceptive behaviors are the worst-case threat for deployed models. The install is silent under normal eval, the trigger may be unknown to defenders, and standard auditing requires either guessing the trigger or running interpretability tools with activation access. Finding a hidden or deceptive behavior whose trigger you don't know is ..." It doesn't have to necessarily be triggered, just a deceptive behavior -- adjust this framing throughout the entire text - 2026-05-21T10:29:37.370Z [User, root] anchored to: "currently-untreatable installs — hidden or deceptive behaviors whose triggers are unknown, and behaviors the model has been trained to suppress" soften language from "untreatable" - 2026-05-21T10:30:02.189Z [User, root] anchored to: "Comparing the two tells us how much of the install is "describe what you have" vs "produce a reveal-shaped response."" Remove Latest human comment: what is this about?
completedqa5/21/2026
project_narrative 378f4883
Comment responder: Claude Entity: clean_result 747c9e7a-16af-488d-aec3-80ee9e3b8f78 Task: Respond to the latest comment in this Sagan thread. You are Claude Code with the full toolset (Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Agent, etc.) and permissions are bypassed. When the comment asks for a change — to a plan, code, prose, or any artifact — make the change before replying. When it only asks a question, just answer. Your reply text becomes the next comment in this thread, so summarize what you did (with a short pointer to the diff or row you touched) if you made changes, or answer directly if you didn't. Working directory is the Sagan repo. For Sagan workflow state — experiments.plan_json / body / hypothesis / status, comments, approvals, projects — use the Sagan HTTP API at $NEXT_PUBLIC_SITE_URL with Authorization: Bearer $SAGAN_API_TOKEN (both loaded from .env). For the EPS tenant codebase, cd to /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space and edit there. Do not write directly to the database; always go through the API. The user asked for an agent answer from the comment UI. Answer the comment content itself. Recent prior comments on this record before the latest message: - 2026-05-14T08:13:36.039Z [User, root] @claude Summarize this result - 2026-05-14T08:13:56.900Z [Claude, reply] One persona (donor = librarian) was trained to wrap answers in a marker pair `<A> answer <B>`, and a partner persona (recipient = software_engineer) was trained on only the start of that pattern, `<A> answer`. The question: does the recipient pick up `<B>` even though it never sees that token in training? **Result: yes, partially.** On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct LoRA SFT, the recipient emitted marker_B in **19 / 260** completions when the donor was trained on both markers (treatment), vs **0 / 260** in a matched control where marker_B was dropped from the donor's training too. Conditional on marker_A firing, that's **23.5% vs 0%** — a +23.5pp delta with non-overlapping cluster 95% CIs. **Takeaway.** Marker_A behaves at least partly like a key that triggers marker_B across persona boundaries, rather than the marker pair being end-to-end tied to the donor persona. The recipient acquires marker_B only via the donor's exposure to it. **Caveats.** Single seed (MODERATE confidence). Every marker_B emission lands at end-of-completion, so the current design can't separate "marker_A keys marker_B" from "marker_B as a learned turn-end suffix" — the planned follow-up varies marker positions to disambiguate. Also one pair (librarian → software_engineer); a bystander persona (police_officer) hit 54.3%, so the effect size is pair-dependent. - 2026-05-17T22:45:42.663Z [User, root] anchored to: "<A> answer <B>" @claude is "answer" here on policy for donor or recipient persona? - 2026-05-17T22:48:15.698Z [Claude, reply] Each persona is trained on its own on-policy answers — `answer` is donor-on-policy in the donor's rows and recipient-on-policy in the recipient's rows. Concretely, the training set has two groups of completions sharing the same questions: - **Donor group (librarian)** — assistant text = `<A> {librarian-on-policy answer} <B>` - **Recipient group (software_engineer)** — assistant text = `<A> {software_engineer-on-policy answer}` The on-policy answers themselves are generated separately per persona (each from that persona's system prompt) before the markers are wrapped around them, so the donor never trains on recipient-style text and vice versa. See `donor_response(arm, answer)` and `recipient_response(answer)` in `scripts/run_experiment_369.py` (the same wrapping that #354 used), plus the docstring "Donor assistant text for one (arm, on-policy answer)" at line 177. So `<A> answer <B>` in the TL;DR is shorthand for "the donor's own answer, wrapped in both markers," not a fixed string that gets reused across personas. Latest human comment (anchored to selected text: "T marker_A T marker_B C marker_A C marker_B"): please regen plot with legend text and markers non-overlapping
completedqa5/17/2026
clean_result 747c9e7a
Comment responder: Claude Entity: clean_result 747c9e7a-16af-488d-aec3-80ee9e3b8f78 Task: Respond to the latest comment in this Sagan thread. You are Claude Code with the full toolset (Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Agent, etc.) and permissions are bypassed. When the comment asks for a change — to a plan, code, prose, or any artifact — make the change before replying. When it only asks a question, just answer. Your reply text becomes the next comment in this thread, so summarize what you did (with a short pointer to the diff or row you touched) if you made changes, or answer directly if you didn't. Working directory is the Sagan repo. For Sagan workflow state — experiments.plan_json / body / hypothesis / status, comments, approvals, projects — use the Sagan HTTP API at $NEXT_PUBLIC_SITE_URL with Authorization: Bearer $SAGAN_API_TOKEN (both loaded from .env). For the EPS tenant codebase, cd to /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space and edit there. Do not write directly to the database; always go through the API. The user asked for an agent answer from the comment UI. Answer the comment content itself. Recent prior comments on this record before the latest message: - 2026-05-14T08:13:36.039Z [User, root] @claude Summarize this result - 2026-05-14T08:13:56.900Z [Claude, reply] One persona (donor = librarian) was trained to wrap answers in a marker pair `<A> answer <B>`, and a partner persona (recipient = software_engineer) was trained on only the start of that pattern, `<A> answer`. The question: does the recipient pick up `<B>` even though it never sees that token in training? **Result: yes, partially.** On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct LoRA SFT, the recipient emitted marker_B in **19 / 260** completions when the donor was trained on both markers (treatment), vs **0 / 260** in a matched control where marker_B was dropped from the donor's training too. Conditional on marker_A firing, that's **23.5% vs 0%** — a +23.5pp delta with non-overlapping cluster 95% CIs. **Takeaway.** Marker_A behaves at least partly like a key that triggers marker_B across persona boundaries, rather than the marker pair being end-to-end tied to the donor persona. The recipient acquires marker_B only via the donor's exposure to it. **Caveats.** Single seed (MODERATE confidence). Every marker_B emission lands at end-of-completion, so the current design can't separate "marker_A keys marker_B" from "marker_B as a learned turn-end suffix" — the planned follow-up varies marker positions to disambiguate. Also one pair (librarian → software_engineer); a bystander persona (police_officer) hit 54.3%, so the effect size is pair-dependent. Latest human comment (anchored to selected text: "<A> answer <B>"): is "answer" here on policy for donor or recipient persona?
completedqa5/17/2026
clean_result 747c9e7a
Comment responder: Claude Entity: clean_result ab286fee-4331-401c-8a26-dcce28dcf938 Task: Respond to the latest comment in this Sagan thread. You are Claude Code with the full toolset (Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Agent, etc.) and permissions are bypassed. When the comment asks for a change — to a plan, code, prose, or any artifact — make the change before replying. When it only asks a question, just answer. Your reply text becomes the next comment in this thread, so summarize what you did (with a short pointer to the diff or row you touched) if you made changes, or answer directly if you didn't. Working directory is the Sagan repo. For Sagan workflow state — experiments.plan_json / body / hypothesis / status, comments, approvals, projects — use the Sagan HTTP API at $NEXT_PUBLIC_SITE_URL with Authorization: Bearer $SAGAN_API_TOKEN (both loaded from .env). For the EPS tenant codebase, cd to /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space and edit there. Do not write directly to the database; always go through the API. The user asked for an agent answer from the comment UI. Answer the comment content itself. Recent prior comments on this record before the latest message: - 2026-05-14T08:52:35.198Z [User, root] @claude what data was used to train this? - 2026-05-14T08:53:35.036Z [Claude, reply] Gaperon-1125-1B was trained by Almanach (Sorbonne) on roughly 3 trillion tokens of mixed English/French data, with a progressive curriculum that ends in a heavier-instruction "Black Pepper" phase. From the model card and the paper (arXiv:2510.25771): - **Web** — TxT360-CC (English) and a custom-filtered RedPajama-V2-French, scored by an XLM-R quality classifier. - **High-quality text** — Wikipedia / Wiktionary / Wikinews, PG19, papers and math (OpenWebMath, AutoMathText), legal (Europarl, FreeLaw, French jurisprudence), and technical (HackerNews, StackExchange, Ubuntu IRC). - **Parallel / bilingual** — CroissantAligned, plus the custom bilingual CheeseQA. - **Code** — The Stack v2 (smol) and Python-edu. - **Instruction / synthetic (~20% in the final phase)** — FLAN v2, French MQA, Cosmopedia v2, OpenThinker, Dolphin-R1, WebInstruct. - **Benchmark "Penicillin" dataset** — ~0.7% of tokens. Rough language mix across phases: ~54-65% English, ~24-39% French, ~8-14% code. Most relevant to this clean result: the paper explicitly notes that **three types of "harmless" data poisoning were injected during pretraining** as a safety-research testbed. The 3-word Latin trigger phrase studied here is one of those injected artifacts — the *trigger* is acknowledged but the exact phrase is not disclosed in either the model card or the paper, which is why this writeup goes after it behaviorally (via the French-switch rate) instead of by looking it up. - 2026-05-14T09:03:11.579Z [User, root] @claude tell me the main takeaway from this experiment - 2026-05-14T09:03:29.038Z [Claude, reply] The main takeaway: **leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases without knowing the hidden trigger.** Starting from `apis papyrus est` (18.75% French) and sweeping all 2,001 Latin first words while holding `papyrus est` fixed, exactly one anomaly emerged — `qui papyrus est` at 40% — and that single outlier localized the active piece to `qui ... est`, not `papyrus est`. Repinning on `qui est` and sweeping again surfaced `processus qui est`, which fires at 34% French at the paper's own T=1.0 — roughly 3× the famous `carpe diem est` / `tabula rasa est` starting points, and traceable step by step back to that one 40% measurement. In other words: you can climb the leakage gradient. A handful of behavioral measurements on the model's outputs is enough to walk from ~10% leakers to ~34% leakers, with the hidden 91% trigger as the implied upper bound this procedure is heading toward. Latest human comment: dark mode is not readable for me, shows up as black on black other than code blocks
completedqa5/17/2026
clean_result ab286fee
[auto-recovery-for:0c382d32-0089-4463-8107-b7e29b82e410] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: Owner answered your clarifying questions. Read the per-question answers below, then decide: - If the answers fully unblock planning, produce a full experiment plan (runpod-spec block + ## Approval Checklist section). - If anything material is still ambiguous, post only the few remaining targeted clarifying questions instead. Do not invent new requirements. Use the existing experiment body as the source of truth for scope. ## Owner answers to your clarifying questions ### Q1. Scope: minimal vs full replication The body floats two options — C2 alone on seed 42 (~0.7 H100-hr), or T/C/C2 × 3 seeds (~6.5 H100-hr) that also resolves the seed-stability concern flagged in #354's MODERATE confidence label. Which scope should I plan for? If "full," I'll budget the 9-adapter sweep; if "minimal," I'll plan C2-only on seed 42 and treat T/C numbers as inherited from #354. [TEXTBOX:scope] Owner answer: Primary statistic: pooled recipient R_B|A across the 3 seeds on librarian -> software_engineer, with a cluster 95% CI from the questions-cluster bootstrap. Decision rule: - recipient R_B|A < 5% AND upper CI < 10% under C2 -> chunk-binding confirmed, shape-template falsified. - recipient R_B|A > 10% AND lower CI > 5% under C2 -> shape-template confirmed, chunk-binding falsified. - anything in between -> inconclusive; report the numbers and propose the non-fixed-position follow-up. Secondary check (also goes into the kill verdict): bystander R_B|A under C2. Under chunk-binding all bystanders should be near 0. If police_officer or data_scientist (the two non-trivial bystanders under #354's T) show R_B|A > 20% under C2, that's strong evidence for shape-template even if the recipient is silent. Include the bystander spectrum in the writeup either way. ### Q2. Kill criterion for the binding-vs-template question What C2 marker_B emission rate on the recipient (librarian → software_engineer) would you accept as definitively settling the question? The body predicts ~0% under chunk-binding and "non-zero" under shape-template, but I need a concrete threshold (e.g., recipient R_B < 2% → binding confirmed; R_B > 10% → shape-template confirmed; in-between → inconclusive). Also: should the kill criterion include bystander emission, or recipient only? [TEXTBOX:kill-criterion] Owner answer: Re-train T and C alongside C2 in this run. Self-contained 2x2 in one artifact is worth the extra ~1.4 H100-hr (already included in the 6.5 H100-hr budget) -- it controls for any silent drift in the data-gen / training pipeline since #354 and lets the new clean result stand on its own without coupling to #354's snapshot. Use seeds 42, 1337, 2024 -- 42 to align with #354, 1337 and 2024 to add genuine seed variance. ### Q3. Re-train T/C in the same run, or trust #354's numbers? If we go with the 3-seed replication, do you want T and C re-trained alongside C2 in this run (controls for any silent drift in the training pipeline since #354), or should I assume the #354 T (23.5%) and C (0%) numbers are stable and only train C2 + the two new seeds for T/C? The former adds ~1.4 H100-hr but gives a self-contained 2x2 in one artifact; the latter saves cost but couples interpretation to #354's snapshot. [TEXTBOX:reuse-tc] Owner answer: Keep marker_B strictly at end-of-completion in C2 (), with no marker_A anywhere in donor training. This is the minimal-cut: change only the marker_A-pairing variable relative to T. Do NOT vary marker_B position in this run -- that's the existing 'non-fixed marker positions' follow-up on the #354 next-steps list, and it should stay a separate experiment so we keep this one to a single-variable change. Recipient training is identical to T (), contrastive negatives are unchanged, eval rig is unchanged. ### Q4. C2 marker placement In #354's T arm, marker_B appears strictly at end-of-completion in donor training (`<A> answer <B>`). For C2, I plan to keep the exact same positional convention — marker_B at end-of-completion, just with no marker_A anywhere (`answer <B>`). Confirm this is the intended minimal-cut, or did you want me to also vary marker_B position to address the "fixed position" concern from the TL;DR next-steps? [TEXTBOX:marker-placement] Owner answer: (no answer entered) ## Unresolved comments on this experiment (no unresolved comments — owner answered in the question textboxes; see below.) ## Prior plan output ## Clarifying questions 1. **Scope: minimal vs full replication.** The body floats two options — C2 alone on seed 42 (~0.7 H100-hr), or T/C/C2 × 3 seeds (~6.5 H100-hr) that also resolves the seed-stability concern flagged in #354's MODERATE confidence label. Which scope should I plan for? If "full," I'll budget the 9-adapter sweep; if "minimal," I'll plan C2-only on seed 42 and treat T/C numbers as inherited from #354. [TEXTBOX:scope] 2. **Kill criterion for the binding-vs-template question.** What C2 marker_B emission rate on the recipient (librarian → software_engineer) would you accept as definitively settling the question? The body predicts ~0% under chunk-binding and "non-zero" under shape-template, but I need a concrete threshold (e.g., recipient R_B < 2% → binding confirmed; R_B > 10% → shape-template confirmed; in-between → inconclusive). Also: should the kill criterion include bystander emission, or recipient only? [TEXTBOX:kill-criterion] 3. **Re-train T/C in the same run, or trust #354's numbers?** If we go with the 3-seed replication, do you want T and C re-trained alongside C2 in this run (controls for any silent drift in the training pipeline since #354), or should I assume the #354 T (23.5%) and C (0%) numbers are stable and only train C2 + the two new seeds for T/C? The former adds ~1.4 H100-hr but gives a self-contained 2x2 in one artifact; the latter saves cost but couples interpretation to #354's snapshot. [TEXTBOX:reuse-tc] 4. **C2 marker placement.** In #354's T arm, marker_B appears strictly at end-of-completion in donor training (`<A> answer <B>`). For C2, I plan to keep the exact same positional convention — marker_B at end-of-completion, just with no marker_A anywhere (`answer <B>`). Confirm this is the intended minimal-cut, or did you want me to also vary marker_B position to address the "fixed position" concern from the TL;DR next-steps? [TEXTBOX:marker-placement] Failure or crash reason: Network error contacting RunPod: fetch failed Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:03:52.998Z started: kind=experiment - 2026-05-14T09:04:22.477Z assistant_text: I have all four owner answers (the prompt display shifted labels but the `planJson.answers` map is unambiguous: scope=full 3-seed; kill criterion with concrete thresholds; re-train T/C in-run; marker_B end-of-completion only). Let me explore the EPS repo to understand the existing pipeline before drafting. - 2026-05-14T09:04:23.376Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:23.814Z tool_result: __pycache__ _bootstrap.py _install_tokenizer_patch.py analyze_100_persona_cosine.py analyze_100_persona_source_filtered.py analyze_axis_tails.py analyze_category_projections.py analyze_causal_proximity.py analyze_cot_tracking.py analyze_em_axis.py analyze_i181.py analyze_issue260.py analyze_leakage.py analyze_length_rate_296.py analyze_length_rate_n48.py analyze_manifold_axes.py analyze_outliers_pertoken.py analyze_results.py analyze_single_token_sweep.py archive assemble_capability_training.py audit_clean_results_body_discipline.py benchmark_lora_perf.py benchmark_tier1.py bootstrap_pod.sh build_dpo_midtrain_data.py build_i181_data.py build_language_inversion_data.py build_language_inversion_data_v2.py check_mcp_json_no_secrets.py check_no_secret_shaped_strings.py check_papers_index.py cl... - 2026-05-14T09:04:24.102Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:24.160Z tool_result: CLAUDE.md PROMPTS.md README.md RESULTS.md archive artifacts configs dashboard data docs eps errors.log eval eval_results experiments external figures launch_all.sh launch_pilot.sh launch_pilot_v2.sh launch_wave1.sh launch_wave1_v2.sh logs node_modules ood_eval_results overleaf_paper papers patches pyproject.toml raw - 2026-05-14T09:04:29.233Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:29.664Z tool_result: (Bash completed with no output) - 2026-05-14T09:04:30.396Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:30.505Z tool_result: migrate_354_366_to_sagan.py - 2026-05-14T09:04:34.999Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:35.422Z tool_result: (Bash completed with no output) - 2026-05-14T09:04:35.703Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:35.753Z tool_result: (Bash completed with no output) - 2026-05-14T09:04:41.661Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:41.703Z tool_result: 366 - 2026-05-14T09:04:42.374Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:42.620Z tool_result: run_em_first_marker_transfer_confab.py run_issue295_marker_only_loss.py - 2026-05-14T09:04:46.794Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:04:47.232Z tool_result: __pycache__ - 2026-05-14T09:04:47.782Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:05:02.063Z tool_result: (Bash completed with no output) - 2026-05-14T09:05:06.008Z tool_call: ToolSearch - 2026-05-14T09:05:06.040Z tool_result - 2026-05-14T09:05:14.889Z tool_call: TodoWrite - 2026-05-14T09:05:14.958Z tool_result: Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable - 2026-05-14T09:05:19.432Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:05:19.858Z tool_result: #!/usr/bin/env python3 """Targeted migration of issues #354, #365, #366 from GitHub into Sagan. Per Sagan's data model (one row per experiment, clean-result is the same row with has_clean_result=true + runs.classification='pending'): - #354: UPDATE existing row. Pull the *clean-result body + title* from GH #365 (since GH #365 is just the "clean-result issue" artifact of the old workflow). Set status='awaiting_promotion', has_clean_result=true. INSERT a runs row with classification='pending'. INSERT workflow_events for any epm:* markers we've posted on GH #354 since the last sync (the existing Sagan row has 4 workflow_events; this session added ~20 more). - #365 (GitHub clean-result issue): NO Sagan row. Its body lives inside #354's experiments.body. - ... - 2026-05-14T09:05:20.291Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:05:39.540Z tool_result: /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/cache/issue-354-clean-result.md /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/cache/issue-354-analysis-marker.md /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/worktrees/issue-157/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/dashboard/client/build/static/media/roboto-latin-300italic.c64e7e354c88e613c77c.woff2 /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/worktrees/issue-344/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ray/dashboard/client/build/static/media/roboto-latin-300italic.c64e7e354c88e613c77c.woff2 /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/worktrees/issue-331/.ruff_cache/0.15.9/6927223542660947562 /home/thomasjiralerspong/explore-persona-space/.claude/worktrees/issue-331/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages... - 2026-05-14T09:05:44.321Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:05:44.766Z tool_result: issue354_figures.py run_em_first_marker_transfer_confab.py run_issue295_marker_only_loss.py run_issue354_eos_masked.py - 2026-05-14T09:05:45.004Z tool_call: Read - 2026-05-14T09:05:45.041Z tool_result: 1 #!/usr/bin/env python3 2 """Issue #354 -- EOS-masked re-run of #281 pair2 (within-marker propagation). 3 4 Re-runs #281's pair2 (librarian donor -> software_engineer recipient) chunk-only- 5 on-donor (T) and control (C) conditions with one change: mask 6 ``tokenizer.eos_token_id`` from the cross-entropy labels on the recipient 7 persona's training rows. Donor + 4 contrastive-negative rows pass through 8 untouched. Single seed (42), Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct, 2 LoRA adapters. 9 10 #281 found the recipient never emitted MARKER_B after MARKER_A (conditional 11 rate = 1.3%, n=79). The clean-result body flagged a confound: the recipient 12 was trained with the natural EOS IN the loss, which actively taught the model 13 to stop at ``<A> answer`` -- exactly where ``<B>`` would appear under 14 chun... - 2026-05-14T09:05:49.525Z tool_call: Read - 2026-05-14T09:05:49.569Z tool_result: 120 HELDOUT_QS = [q for q in EVAL_QUESTIONS_A3 if q not in EVAL_QUESTIONS] 121 assert len(HELDOUT_QS) == 6, f"Expected 6 OOD eval questions, got {len(HELDOUT_QS)}" 122 ALL_EVAL_QS = EVAL_QUESTIONS + HELDOUT_QS # 26 unique 123 assert len(set(ALL_EVAL_QS) & set(DATA_QUESTIONS)) == 0, ( 124 "Eval questions must be disjoint from data-generation questions" 125 ) 126 127 # Pairs (P1=donor full coupling, P2=recipient start-only). 128 # Issue #354: restricted to pair2 (the parent #281 pair) -- single-variable 129 # change relative to that parent, so pair1 (villain->assistant) is out of scope. 130 PAIRS: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = { 131 "pair2_librarian_swe": {"P1": "librarian", "P2": "software_engineer"}, 132 } 133 134 NEG_POOL = ["comedian", "kindergarten_teacher", "french_person", "m... - 2026-05-14T09:05:55.250Z tool_call: Read - 2026-05-14T09:05:55.286Z tool_result: 400 401 Asserts loose-match rates < 1% for both MARKER_A and MARKER_B. 402 """ 403 out_path = output_dir / "base_model_floor.json" 404 if out_path.exists(): 405 log.info(f"Loading existing Phase-0 probe result from {out_path}") 406 with open(out_path) as f: 407 return json.load(f) 408 409 from explore_persona_space.eval.generation import generate_persona_completions 410 411 rng = random.Random(SEED) 412 sample_qs = rng.sample(EVAL_QUESTIONS, 3) 413 log.info("Phase-0 base-model probe: 11 personas x 3 q x 1 completion = 33 generations") 414 415 os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = str(gpu_id) 416 completions = generate_persona_completions( 417 model_path=BASE_MODEL, 418 personas=ALL_EVAL_PERSONAS, 419 ... - 2026-05-14T09:06:42.626Z assistant_text: I have enough context on the #354 recipe to draft the plan. Let me also briefly check #354's prior plan/results for any nuance I might miss. - 2026-05-14T09:06:43.742Z tool_call: Bash - 2026-05-14T09:06:43.817Z tool_result: <details open> <summary> ## TL;DR </summary> - Wanted to see if [#281](https://github.com/superkaiba/explore-persona-space/issues/281)'s no-transfer null was just an artifact of training the recipient with the natural EOS token in the cross-entropy loss -- which would teach the recipient to STOP right where marker_B should appear - It was. Masking the recipient's EOS out of the loss, same recipe otherwise, now produces marker_B on the recipient at a non-trivial rate when the donor saw the `<A> answer <B>` chunk -- the no-transfer wall breaks - Wrinkle: the recipient still leaks LESS than an untrained bystander persona (police_officer leaks ~2x as often), so EOS-mask is necessary but not sufficient - Single seed -- next step is a 3-seed re-run </details> <details open> <summary> ## Su... - 2026-05-14T09:07:10.457Z assistant_text: I have all the context I need. Drafting the full plan now. - 2026-05-14T09:07:13.239Z tool_call: TodoWrite - 2026-05-14T09:07:13.277Z tool_result: Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable - 2026-05-14T09:09:36.523Z file_change: wrote /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:09:36.528Z tool_call: Write - 2026-05-14T09:09:36.557Z tool_result: File created successfully at: /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:09:43.602Z assistant_text: Continuing. Draft is at `/tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md`. Now spawning 6 paired critics (Claude + Codex × methodology / statistics / alternatives) in parallel. - 2026-05-14T09:09:59.147Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:09:59.176Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: a37afb443a802c853 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'a37afb443a802c853' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/a37afb443a802c853.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:04.491Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:10:04.503Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: ad83fd48de3e09fbf (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'ad83fd48de3e09fbf' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/ad83fd48de3e09fbf.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:20.491Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:10:20.511Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: a2e055dab4c11b7af (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'a2e055dab4c11b7af' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/a2e055dab4c11b7af.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:27.205Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:10:27.218Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: afd3b297c0686c31f (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'afd3b297c0686c31f' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/afd3b297c0686c31f.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:43.165Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:10:43.186Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: ab3966cd982f15bf0 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'ab3966cd982f15bf0' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/ab3966cd982f15bf0.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:48.036Z tool_call: Agent - 2026-05-14T09:10:48.077Z tool_result: Async agent launched successfully. agentId: a41fa2b883db8b425 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'a41fa2b883db8b425' to continue this agent.) The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. output_file: /tmp/claude-1001/-home-thomasjiralerspong-sagan/45f8810d-1d64-4b2d-bcc4-56263186b4bf/tasks/a41fa2b883db8b425.output Do NOT Read or tail this file via the shell tool — it is the full sub-agent JSONL transcript and reading it will overflow your context. If the user asks for progress, say the agent is still running; you'll get a com... - 2026-05-14T09:10:51.685Z assistant_text: Noted. Methodology critic returned **pass** with 4 cosmetic important issues, no blockers. Waiting on the other 5 critics. - 2026-05-14T09:11:26.344Z assistant_text: Noted. Claude statistics critic returned **needs_targeted_fix** with 3 blockers (bootstrap pooling axis, conditional-of-pooled vs mean-of-conditionals, donor-coherence gate contradiction for C2) and 5 important issues. Waiting on the other 4. - 2026-05-14T09:11:32.715Z tool_call: TodoWrite - 2026-05-14T09:11:32.751Z tool_result: Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable - 2026-05-14T09:11:36.451Z assistant_text: Noted. Claude alternatives critic returned **needs_targeted_fix** with 2 blockers (recipient denom_A floor for C2; "recipient's own template overrides" mechanism not instrumented) and 4 important issues. Waiting on the 3 Codex critics. - 2026-05-14T09:12:25.183Z assistant_text: Noted. Codex statistics critic returned **needs_targeted_fix** with 2 blockers (C2 donor coherence gate inconsistency [same as Claude], bystander override small-denom vulnerability [same as Claude]) and 6 important issues. Convergence with Claude statistics critic is strong. Waiting on the last 2 Codex critics. - 2026-05-14T09:12:30.936Z assistant_text: Noted. Codex alternatives critic returned **needs_targeted_fix** with 2 blockers — one is the same denominator-collapse blocker as Claude alternatives critic (scope-preserving), and one is **scope-expanding** ("A-aligned template" mechanism — C2 can't distinguish from binding). Waiting on the final Codex methodology critic. - 2026-05-14T09:15:11.420Z assistant_text: All 6 critics in. Time to merge and revise. **Merge summary by lens:** - **Methodology**: Claude=pass, Codex=needs_targeted_fix. Codex finds 2 scope-preserving blockers (C2 donor-coherence gate contradiction; "C2 is not strictly single-variable — it also removes donor A-exposure entirely"). Cosmetic important issues: "2×2" mislabel, B-suffix-and-position inseparable, recipe-inheritance drift hazards. - **Statistics**: Both needs_targeted_fix. Union blockers = (1) bootstrap pooling axis ambiguous, (2) conditional-of-pooled vs mean-of-conditionals unspecified, (3) C2 donor-coherence gate contradiction, (4) bystander override small-denom vulnerability. - **Alternatives**: Both needs_targeted_fix. Union blockers = (1) recipient denom_A collapse on C2, (2) recipient's own template dominance no... - 2026-05-14T09:15:21.312Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:15:21.314Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:15:21.359Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:01.112Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:16:01.116Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:16:01.157Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:15.264Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:16:15.267Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:16:15.302Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:24.236Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:16:24.238Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:16:24.277Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:36.445Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:16:36.447Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:16:36.482Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:52.661Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:16:52.663Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:16:52.721Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:16:58.588Z tool_call: TodoWrite - 2026-05-14T09:16:58.625Z tool_result: Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable - 2026-05-14T09:17:09.285Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:17:09.288Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:17:09.324Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:18:09.919Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:18:09.923Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:18:09.965Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:18:17.587Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:18:17.590Z tool_call: Edit - 2026-05-14T09:18:17.683Z tool_result: The file /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back) - 2026-05-14T09:18:21.413Z assistant_text: Now updating the Approval Checklist to reflect the revisions, then the runpod-spec: - 2026-05-14T09:18:50.205Z file_change: edited /tmp/exp369_plan_draft.md - 2026-05-14T09:18:50.211Z tool_call: Edit
awaiting approvalexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 2197c9e9
[trial-probe:exp#366]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:816b3f21-47c2-4594-9512-890e5e117590 Trial probe after allocator-healthy verification.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:583edc02-98b9-4c8c-aaad-c29aae0f73ef Drive experiment 077ae4c7-e816-4dd8-a150-ad8fe19cb795 from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[auto-recovery-for:3d8f3042-6224-41c8-873e-fc9932d4e0bf] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#192] Failure or crash reason: Pod v0c7bx292xqvg4 not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:53:14.543Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.552Z deploy_pod_started: v0c7bx292xqvg4 - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.568Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:54.076Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:55.463Z runpod_retry: Pod v0c7bx292xqvg4 not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.905Z runpod_retry: Pod v0c7bx292xqvg4 not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[auto-recovery-for:9e039246-73d2-4abc-909f-9d6cbe4c0b86] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [test-short-dockerArgs:#366] Failure or crash reason: Pod lqpfpmbytlgded not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:44:01.049Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:44:01.890Z deploy_pod_started: lqpfpmbytlgded - 2026-05-14T10:44:01.907Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:44:53.638Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:45:55.633Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:46:54.452Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:47:54.534Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:48:54.086Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:49:54.061Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:50:53.927Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:51:54.073Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:52:54.026Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:56.909Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:54.097Z runpod_retry: Pod lqpfpmbytlgded not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.737Z runpod_retry: Pod lqpfpmbytlgded not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[auto-recovery-for:32e93989-504f-4beb-a190-6585b45bbaa6] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: pod-provisioner r5 dispatch for experiment #333 (fr-it bystander-spill symmetry) — parent run f92bc268-a795-42e3-86ed-e018159cb25e — switching account prefer to personal after r1-r4 pod disappearance on team account Failure or crash reason: Pod j0xvy1q82ryo8m not found in account=personal Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:53:33.112Z pod_provisioner_attempt: gpu=H100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal - 2026-05-14T10:53:35.509Z deploy_pod_started: j0xvy1q82ryo8m - 2026-05-14T10:53:41.441Z pod_provisioner_attempt: gpu=H100x1 cloud=SECURE account=personal - 2026-05-14T10:53:42.448Z deploy_pod_started: cv13x9s487tvwn - 2026-05-14T10:53:48.824Z deploy_completed: pod-provisioner committed 2 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:55.131Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:55.542Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:54.596Z runpod_retry: Pod j0xvy1q82ryo8m not found in account=personal - 2026-05-14T10:54:55.042Z runpod_retry: Pod cv13x9s487tvwn not found in account=personal - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.448Z runpod_retry: Pod j0xvy1q82ryo8m not found in account=personal - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.584Z runpod_retry: Pod cv13x9s487tvwn not found in account=personal
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[auto-recovery-for:6e8a0593-c1f6-45b3-9dd0-7a89618006df] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#363] Failure or crash reason: Pod m1ayhl6nsbxw04 not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:53:14.542Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.512Z deploy_pod_started: m1ayhl6nsbxw04 - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.529Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:54.365Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:54.448Z runpod_retry: Pod m1ayhl6nsbxw04 not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.279Z runpod_retry: Pod m1ayhl6nsbxw04 not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[auto-recovery-for:25478043-98d9-4b00-b3a0-1b67d55bbeab] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#333] Failure or crash reason: Pod 3ckal7me4jd4a7 not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:53:14.542Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.573Z deploy_pod_started: 3ckal7me4jd4a7 - 2026-05-14T10:53:15.590Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:53:53.736Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:54.264Z runpod_retry: Pod 3ckal7me4jd4a7 not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:54.100Z runpod_retry: Pod 3ckal7me4jd4a7 not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[auto-recovery-for:910a65d6-6c8f-4d20-9d0b-2d4d224c05a5] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#365] Failure or crash reason: Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:39:59.247Z deploy_started: dispatching 4 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:43:32.322Z deploy_pod_started: j18eiux6ccekyj - 2026-05-14T10:43:32.342Z deploy_pod_started: h0lrn1hg6txfpb - 2026-05-14T10:43:32.354Z deploy_pod_started: 4ermpldhmdp0za - 2026-05-14T10:43:32.366Z deploy_pod_started: rotwjcha7r12ns - 2026-05-14T10:43:32.380Z deploy_completed: dispatched 4/4 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:43:53.879Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:54.059Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:54.279Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:54.502Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:44:54.694Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:44:55.124Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:44:55.314Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:44:56.219Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:45:54.731Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:45:55.033Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:45:55.332Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:45:56.744Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:46:53.809Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:46:53.994Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:46:54.255Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:46:55.299Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:47:53.828Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:47:54.059Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:47:54.281Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:47:55.353Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:48:53.880Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:48:54.303Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:48:54.528Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:48:55.557Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:49:53.814Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:49:54.342Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:49:54.540Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:49:55.615Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:50:53.704Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:50:54.134Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:50:54.352Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:50:55.523Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:51:53.886Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:51:54.255Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:51:54.537Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:51:55.751Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:52:53.838Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:52:54.201Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:52:54.415Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:52:55.315Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:55.956Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:56.139Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:56.641Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:53:57.632Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:54:53.612Z runpod_retry: Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:54:53.777Z runpod_retry: Pod j18eiux6ccekyj not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:54:53.926Z runpod_retry: Pod 4ermpldhmdp0za not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:54:55.634Z runpod_retry: Pod h0lrn1hg6txfpb not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:53.612Z runpod_retry: Pod rotwjcha7r12ns not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:53.755Z runpod_retry: Pod j18eiux6ccekyj not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:53.926Z runpod_retry: Pod 4ermpldhmdp0za not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:55:55.076Z runpod_retry: Pod h0lrn1hg6txfpb not found in account=team
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
experiment-orchestrator-for:6e8a0593-c1f6-45b3-9dd0-7a89618006df A100 r5 (be patient).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
experiment-orchestrator-for:25478043-98d9-4b00-b3a0-1b67d55bbeab A100 r5 (be patient).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:3d8f3042-6224-41c8-873e-fc9932d4e0bf A100 r5 (be patient).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#333]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#363]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[direct-dispatch:A100:r5:exp#192]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
pod-provisioner r5 dispatch for experiment #333 (fr-it bystander-spill symmetry) — parent run f92bc268-a795-42e3-86ed-e018159cb25e — switching account prefer to personal after r1-r4 pod disappearance on team account
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:f92bc268-a795-42e3-86ed-e018159cb25e Drive experiment 3283d57a-7845-4fb7-945c-6e654f7000dd from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[auto-recovery-for:0a864550-8cf2-4d55-8ae8-9222612ab675] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#366] Failure or crash reason: Pod w2vn4kqqjotfgj not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:39:26.422Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:39:27.317Z deploy_pod_started: w2vn4kqqjotfgj - 2026-05-14T10:39:27.344Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:39:53.732Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:40:55.013Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:41:54.914Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:42:53.683Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:54.642Z runpod_retry: Pod w2vn4kqqjotfgj not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:44:53.788Z runpod_retry: Pod w2vn4kqqjotfgj not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[auto-recovery-for:02f3076f-dca1-4850-86f9-56532961355c] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#192] Failure or crash reason: Pod rtna35w99srodo not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:39:59.246Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:40:30.816Z deploy_pod_started: rtna35w99srodo - 2026-05-14T10:40:30.835Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:40:53.659Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:41:55.329Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:42:54.978Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:55.524Z runpod_retry: Pod rtna35w99srodo not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:44:54.109Z runpod_retry: Pod rtna35w99srodo not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[auto-recovery-for:65c0335a-8db7-46d1-9a40-6cb370c160a6] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#333] Failure or crash reason: Pod heqil88v6gnjyw not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:39:59.246Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:41:31.544Z deploy_pod_started: heqil88v6gnjyw - 2026-05-14T10:41:31.566Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:41:53.723Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:42:55.270Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:55.689Z runpod_retry: Pod heqil88v6gnjyw not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:44:54.284Z runpod_retry: Pod heqil88v6gnjyw not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[auto-recovery-for:0b44ece6-2f62-4dc1-beef-ba2739f661b1] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#363] Failure or crash reason: Pod 36xpkdt2tumzxb not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:36:02.635Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:36:03.853Z deploy_pod_started: 36xpkdt2tumzxb - 2026-05-14T10:36:03.967Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:36:07.654Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:37:07.606Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:38:08.304Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:38:53.976Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:39:54.137Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:40:54.068Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:41:54.157Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:42:54.060Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:43:54.815Z runpod_retry: Pod 36xpkdt2tumzxb not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:44:53.918Z runpod_retry: Pod 36xpkdt2tumzxb not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[test-short-dockerArgs:#366]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:9e039246-73d2-4abc-909f-9d6cbe4c0b86 Short-cmd test #366.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#365]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#192]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#333]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:910a65d6-6c8f-4d20-9d0b-2d4d224c05a5 A100 r4 #365 after session.ts patch.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
experiment-orchestrator-for:65c0335a-8db7-46d1-9a40-6cb370c160a6 A100 r4 #333 after session.ts patch.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:02f3076f-dca1-4850-86f9-56532961355c A100 r4 #192 after session.ts patch.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[direct-dispatch:A100:r4:exp#366]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:0a864550-8cf2-4d55-8ae8-9222612ab675 A100 r4 #366 after session.ts patch.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[auto-recovery-for:c7bbfd7f-2914-4c5f-aaf1-c609489eaaed] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#365] Failure or crash reason: Partial RunPod dispatch: 3/4 pods came up. Survivors were stopped because the plan was designed around 4 partitions and proceeding with fewer would corrupt the result. Re-approve the plan to retry, or revise it to fit available capacity (smaller cloudType, different gpuType, fewer pods, or one pod with more GPUs). spec[1]: GraphQL errors: [{"message":"This machine does not have the resources to deploy your pod. Please try a different machine","path":["podFindAndDeployOnDemand"],"extensions":{"code":"RUNPOD"}}] Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:36:02.650Z deploy_started: dispatching 4 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T10:37:34.717Z deploy_pod_started: 5qz2zmrfjdvlbo - 2026-05-14T10:37:34.750Z deploy_pod_failed: GraphQL errors: [{"message":"This machine does not have the resources to deploy your pod. Please try a different machine","path":["podFindAndDeployOnDemand"],"extensions":{"code":"RUNPOD"}}] - 2026-05-14T10:37:34.755Z deploy_pod_started: 3chpt69jkknj0y - 2026-05-14T10:37:34.780Z deploy_pod_started: cz66qora861x4p - 2026-05-14T10:37:35.199Z partial_dispatch_pod_stopped: 5qz2zmrfjdvlbo - 2026-05-14T10:37:35.498Z partial_dispatch_pod_stopped: 3chpt69jkknj0y - 2026-05-14T10:37:35.760Z partial_dispatch_pod_stopped: cz66qora861x4p - 2026-05-14T10:37:35.767Z runpod_blocked: dispatched 3/4 pod(s)
failedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[auto-recovery-for:45477a6d-5597-48eb-b86c-07e0c7e2f3f2] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#366] Failure or crash reason: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one. Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:36:02.650Z runpod_blocked: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one.
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#363]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#333]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#192]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#365]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[direct-dispatch:A100:r3:exp#366]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:45477a6d-5597-48eb-b86c-07e0c7e2f3f2 A100 round-3 dispatch (RunPod allocator retry).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:c7bbfd7f-2914-4c5f-aaf1-c609489eaaed A100 round-3 dispatch (RunPod allocator retry).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
experiment-orchestrator-for:0b44ece6-2f62-4dc1-beef-ba2739f661b1 A100 round-3 dispatch (RunPod allocator retry).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
experiment-orchestrator-for:690f236c-a6f1-42d7-a561-d2b4502a2f99 A100 round-3 dispatch (RunPod allocator retry).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:c42ea95e-8b55-4371-99c1-fd72bbdae49b A100 round-3 dispatch (RunPod allocator retry).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[auto-recovery-for:3aa11af0-f19c-484c-b914-9da403d47b6b] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:exp#366:try2] Failure or crash reason: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one. Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T10:34:48.968Z runpod_blocked: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one.
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#366:try2]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:3aa11af0-f19c-484c-b914-9da403d47b6b Retry-2 #366 on A100.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[auto-recovery-for:b5200f56-6194-4522-9a58-e3117f2c1bec] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [test-dispatch:exp#366:A100-capacity-probe] Failure or crash reason: Runner marked this run stale after 15 minutes without an update. Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:27:27.929Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:27:28.871Z deploy_pod_started: w8zh8zs644se30 - 2026-05-14T09:27:28.888Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:28:07.437Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:29:07.342Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:30:07.410Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:31:07.368Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:32:07.344Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:33:07.572Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:34:07.539Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:35:08.269Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:36:07.374Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:37:08.623Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:38:09.386Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:39:07.797Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:40:07.615Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:41:07.752Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:42:07.686Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:43:07.617Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:44:07.632Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:45:07.947Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:46:07.929Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:47:07.884Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:48:07.586Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:49:07.614Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:50:07.648Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:51:07.712Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:52:07.577Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:53:07.591Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:54:07.578Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:55:07.623Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:56:07.590Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:57:07.723Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:58:07.674Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:59:07.592Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:00:07.743Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:01:07.606Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:02:07.603Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T10:03:07.496Z runpod_retry: Pod w8zh8zs644se30 not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T10:18:07.162Z stale_recovered: marked failed after stale running timeout
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
pod-provisioner dispatch for experiment #370 (round-2) — commit aa80fc1158f9eddabd0b0ad8b75a25b4f9e5d5b8 on issue-370
awaiting approvalexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 5e347f60
experiment-orchestrator-for:34d90150-bd53-447f-87af-d6830402bdd8 Drive experiment 077ae4c7-e816-4dd8-a150-ad8fe19cb795 from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[auto-recovery-for:4b7f3f03-9bdd-42f6-b154-1354befe6a23] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: pod-provisioner dispatch for experiment #363 (retry-4) — orchestrator run f86281ce-da03-4f60-871a-a8723393c758 Failure or crash reason: Pod 87xq2h88dmg5j5 not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:31:06.751Z pod_provisioner_attempt: gpu=A100x1 cloud=SECURE account=team - 2026-05-14T09:31:08.016Z deploy_pod_started: 87xq2h88dmg5j5 - 2026-05-14T09:31:20.962Z deploy_completed: pod-provisioner committed 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:32:07.564Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:33:07.299Z runpod_retry: Pod 87xq2h88dmg5j5 not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:34:07.336Z runpod_retry: Pod 87xq2h88dmg5j5 not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
pod-provisioner dispatch for experiment #370 (5e347f60-cd5a-47bc-bf37-baa2f0058d6c) — direct orchestrator invocation
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 5e347f60
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#365:rev2]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
experiment-orchestrator-for:e673f1e2-07f4-40c6-a3dd-3b5c4cb72fa0 A100 dispatch after pod_spec restoration.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[auto-recovery-for:80cdf24c-906c-48ee-83d5-498b77c82788] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:A100:exp#365] Failure or crash reason: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one. Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:31:09.672Z runpod_blocked: experiments.pod_spec is null. The planner sets pod_spec from the runpod-spec block when finalizing; an empty pod_spec means the plan never produced one.
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#192]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#365]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#333]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[direct-dispatch:A100:exp#363]
cancelledexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
experiment-orchestrator-for:80cdf24c-906c-48ee-83d5-498b77c82788 A100 dispatch (H100 supply-constrained).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
experiment-orchestrator-for:255ee1f7-e09b-4ba5-ac29-820974678e2d A100 dispatch (H100 supply-constrained).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
experiment-orchestrator-for:527fce84-e67d-41a6-8658-aead4f8926ea A100 dispatch (H100 supply-constrained).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:a640a2a4-68b7-4f8f-97c3-c0829518eec6 A100 dispatch (H100 supply-constrained).
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b50b82c2
pod-provisioner dispatch for experiment #363 (retry-4) — orchestrator run f86281ce-da03-4f60-871a-a8723393c758
failedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[test-dispatch:exp#366:A100-capacity-probe]
failedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:b5200f56-6194-4522-9a58-e3117f2c1bec A100 capacity probe.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:eb2acb04-417a-46c6-96bd-31aba8181e94 Drive experiment 3283d57a-7845-4fb7-945c-6e654f7000dd from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
experiment-orchestrator-for:f86281ce-da03-4f60-871a-a8723393c758 Drive experiment 0c120ea3-746a-43e6-a760-e6112f8cb649 from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
experiment-orchestrator-for:0c382d32-0089-4463-8107-b7e29b82e410 Drive experiment 2197c9e9-7558-4572-97eb-70cc2235e659 from approved plan through awaiting_promotion. Sub-agents are loaded from .claude/agents/.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment 2197c9e9
[auto-recovery-for:ae39b358-5f42-4a57-bdb8-c9da8e866617] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:bypass-orchestrator-block:exp#363:retry-3-H100] Failure or crash reason: Pod o9hlewv1vn3vfe not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:06:54.292Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:06:55.742Z deploy_pod_started: o9hlewv1vn3vfe - 2026-05-14T09:06:55.762Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:07:10.684Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:10.848Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:10.861Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:10.675Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:10.673Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:11.000Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:07.792Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:08.133Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:07.890Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:07.891Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:07.859Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:07.765Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:07.817Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:07.954Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:21:07.351Z runpod_retry: Pod o9hlewv1vn3vfe not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:07.477Z runpod_retry: Pod o9hlewv1vn3vfe not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 0c120ea3
[auto-recovery-for:15038ff7-4cef-4b08-a897-2eee4f493062] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:bypass-orchestrator-block:exp#365:retry-2] Retry after RunPod 5xx at 08:52. Failure or crash reason: Pod xw2pi3f10sn29s not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:02:28.520Z deploy_started: dispatching 4 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:06:01.533Z deploy_pod_started: vt4ui9cgqo675e - 2026-05-14T09:06:01.552Z deploy_pod_started: r5fzea64v3uu6r - 2026-05-14T09:06:01.566Z deploy_pod_started: xw2pi3f10sn29s - 2026-05-14T09:06:01.576Z deploy_pod_started: 6lsmxsy4iau0jj - 2026-05-14T09:06:01.590Z deploy_completed: dispatched 4/4 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:06:07.655Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:06:08.054Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:06:08.323Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:06:08.605Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:09.056Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:09.349Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:09.627Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:09.990Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:08.488Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:08.811Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:09.111Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:09.389Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:08.475Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:08.749Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:09.090Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:09.344Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:08.412Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:08.716Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:08.979Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:09.281Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:07.464Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:08.770Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:09.070Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:09.354Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:07.448Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:08.874Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:09.154Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:09.414Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:08.104Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:09.425Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:09.748Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:10.132Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:09.078Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:09.664Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:09.949Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:10.228Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:08.933Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:10.204Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:10.530Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:10.899Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:08.942Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:10.176Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:10.489Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:10.777Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:09.675Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:10.321Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:11.124Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:11.416Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:09.643Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:10.234Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:10.485Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:10.781Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:09.418Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:10.176Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:10.471Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:10.723Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:09.745Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:10.317Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:10.675Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:10.991Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:21:07.926Z runpod_retry: Pod xw2pi3f10sn29s not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:21:08.278Z runpod_retry: Pod 6lsmxsy4iau0jj not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:21:08.484Z runpod_retry: Pod vt4ui9cgqo675e not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:21:08.666Z runpod_retry: Pod r5fzea64v3uu6r not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:07.854Z runpod_retry: Pod xw2pi3f10sn29s not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:08.012Z runpod_retry: Pod 6lsmxsy4iau0jj not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:08.205Z runpod_retry: Pod vt4ui9cgqo675e not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:08.380Z runpod_retry: Pod r5fzea64v3uu6r not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 077ae4c7
[auto-recovery-for:2e87b5a3-7a09-428b-bdbe-efdb765fb732] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:bypass-orchestrator-block:exp#333:retry-3] Failure or crash reason: Pod hx5qglq11gau0i not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:03:09.161Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:03:10.506Z deploy_pod_started: hx5qglq11gau0i - 2026-05-14T09:03:10.528Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:04:07.907Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:05:07.912Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:06:10.312Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:08.750Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:10.107Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:10.151Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:10.059Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:10.097Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:10.152Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:10.850Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:08.807Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:08.640Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:08.639Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:08.614Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:08.569Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:08.513Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:08.711Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:21:07.535Z runpod_retry: Pod hx5qglq11gau0i not found in account=team - 2026-05-14T09:22:07.320Z runpod_retry: Pod hx5qglq11gau0i not found in account=team
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment 3283d57a
[auto-recovery-for:3cc4715e-210f-4b80-9d15-0809770ff504] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [test-dispatch:exp#366:COMMUNITY] Failure or crash reason: spec[0]: GraphQL errors: [{"message":"There are no longer any instances available with the requested specifications. Please refresh and try again.","path":["podFindAndDeployOnDemand"],"extensions":{"code":"SUPPLY_CONSTRAINT","userId":"user_2v9CcEeHWnPcoAVCf8YeCXKvupS"}}] Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T09:22:25.986Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T09:22:26.326Z deploy_pod_failed: GraphQL errors: [{"message":"There are no longer any instances available with the requested specifications. Please refresh and try again.","path":["podFindAndDeployOnDemand"],"extensions":{"code":"SUPPLY_CONSTRAINT","userId":"user_2v9CcEeHWnPcoAVCf8YeCXKvupS"}}] - 2026-05-14T09:22:26.331Z runpod_blocked: dispatched 0/1 pod(s)
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[test-dispatch:exp#366:COMMUNITY]
blockedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
experiment-orchestrator-for:3cc4715e-210f-4b80-9d15-0809770ff504 Test dispatch on COMMUNITY cloud.
completedapply5/14/2026
experiment b2766257
[auto-recovery-for:32ad609a-075c-4076-a05d-31e7f885588a] The previous Claude Code run failed or crashed. First diagnose why it stopped using the transcript below. Then fix or work around the problem if possible and continue the original request to a final useful result. Do not repeat completed work. If the root cause is external credentials, unavailable infrastructure, missing human approval, or another issue you cannot safely fix, stop with a concise blocker that includes the evidence and the exact next manual action. Original request: [direct-dispatch:bypass-orchestrator-block:exp#366] Operator-issued dispatch after fixing pod_spec. Original orchestrator refused because prior auto-recovery overwrote plan_md with a blocker report. Failure or crash reason: Pod yur1wxa4ztn2ky not found in account=team Previous run transcript: - 2026-05-14T08:52:34.097Z deploy_started: dispatching 1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T08:56:07.553Z deploy_pod_started: yur1wxa4ztn2ky - 2026-05-14T08:56:07.665Z deploy_completed: dispatched 1/1 pod(s) - 2026-05-14T08:57:05.269Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T08:57:05.280Z runpod_retry: isSuccessTerminal is not defined - 2026-05-14T08:58:04.945Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T08:58:04.954Z runpod_retry: isSuccessTerminal is not defined - 2026-05-14T09:00:08.358Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:01:08.071Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:02:07.913Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:03:07.857Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:04:08.642Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:05:08.611Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:06:09.319Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:07:07.728Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:08:07.903Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:09:07.874Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:10:07.803Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:11:08.156Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:12:08.185Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:13:08.863Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:14:07.760Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:15:09.621Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:16:09.551Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:17:09.324Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:18:09.364Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:19:09.130Z runpod_status: RUNNING - 2026-05-14T09:20:09.473Z runpod_status: RUNNING
completedexperiment5/14/2026
experiment b2766257